Sketches of the Christian life and public labors of William Miller : $b Gathered from his memoir by the late Sylvester Bliss, and from other sourcesWhite, James
Philosophy
Sketches of the Christian life and public labors of William Miller : $b Gathered from his memoir by the late Sylvester Bliss, and from other sources
White, James
Miller, William, 1782-1849
“To the church, his devotion of himself to his Master’s service was as
welcome as his labors were efficient. The opposite party, especially
the more gifted of them, regarded him as a powerful, and, therefore, a
desirable, antagonist. He knew the strength of both parties. That of the
former he had often tested, when, in his attacks, though they might have
been silenced, he had felt that he had a bad cause; and the weakness of
the latter had been forcibly impressed on him in his fruitless efforts to
assure himself that they were right. He knew all their weak points, and
where their weapons could be turned against them. They were not disposed
to yield the ground without a struggle, and began their attack on him by
using the weapons and assailing the points which characterized his own
former attacks on Christianity; and to this fact, under God, is probably
owing his subsequent worldwide notoriety.
“He had taunted his friends with entertaining ‘a blind faith’ in the
Bible, containing, as it did, many things which they confessed their
inability to explain. He had enjoyed putting perplexing questions to
clergymen and others—triumphing in their unsatisfactory replies. These
questions had not been forgotten; and his Christian friends, also, turned
his former taunts upon himself.
“Soon after his renunciation of deism, in conversing with a friend
respecting the hope of a glorious eternity through the merits and
intercessions of Christ, he was asked how he knew there was such a
Saviour. He replied, ‘It is revealed in the Bible.’ ‘How do you know
the Bible is true?’ was the response, with a reiteration of his former
arguments on the contradictions and mysticisms in which he had claimed it
was shrouded.
“Mr. Miller felt such taunts in their full force. He was at first
perplexed; but, on reflection, he considered that if the Bible is a
revelation of God, it must be consistent with itself; all its parts must
harmonize, must have been given for man’s instruction, and, consequently,
must be adapted to his understanding. He, therefore, said, ‘Give me
time, and I will harmonize all these apparent contradictions to my own
satisfaction, or I will be a deist still.’
“He then devoted himself to the prayerful reading of the word. He
laid aside all commentaries, and used the marginal references and his
concordance as his only helps. He saw that he must distinguish between
the Bible and all the peculiar and partisan interpretations of it. The
Bible was older than them all, must be above them all; and he placed it
there. He saw that it must correct all interpretations; and in correcting
them, its own pure light would shine without the mists which traditionary
belief had involved it in. He resolved to lay aside all preconceived
opinions, and to receive, with child-like simplicity, the natural and
obvious meaning of Scripture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account