Slavery and the ConstitutionBowditch, William I. (William Ingersoll)
Religion
Slavery and the Constitution
Bowditch, William I. (William Ingersoll)
Enslaved persons -- United States -- Social conditions; Slavery -- United States
Page 612: "If the Constitution had not contained this clause, every
non-slaveholding State in the Union would have been at liberty to
have declared free all runaway slaves coming within its limits, and
to have given them entire immunity and protection against the claims
of their masters;--a course which would have created the most bitter
animosities, and engendered perpetual strife, between the different
States. The clause was, therefore, of the last importance to the
safety and security of the Southern States, and could not have been
surrendered by them without endangering their whole property in
slaves. The clause was accordingly adopted into the Constitution by
the unanimous consent of the framers of it;--a proof at once of its
intrinsic and practical necessity."
Page 613: "Upon this ground, we have not the slightest hesitation in
holding, that, under and in virtue of the Constitution, the owner of
a slave is clothed with entire authority, in every State in the
Union, to seize and recapture his slave, whenever he can do it
without any breach of the peace or any illegal violence. In this
sense, and to this extent, this clause of the Constitution may
properly be said to execute itself, and to require no aid from
legislation, state or national."
Page 625: "Upon these grounds, we are of opinion, that the Act of
Pennsylvania upon which this indictment is founded is
unconstitutional and void. It purports to punish, as a public
offence against that State, the very act of seizing and removing a
slave by his master, which the Constitution of the United States was
designed to justify and uphold."
SUPPRESSION OF SLAVE INSURRECTIONS. (Const. Art. 1, sec. 8; Art. 4, sec.
4.)
We are not aware of any decision of the supreme court upon the meaning
of these clauses; but it seems difficult to conceive, that they would
hold that the word "insurrections" did not include all insurrections.
* * * * *
Such is the Constitution according to the plain, obvious, and common
meaning of its terms; such it was intended to be made by its framers;
such has been the interpretation constantly followed in the practice of
the government, from the time of its adoption until now; and such it is
according to the decision of the final interpreter of its meaning. As
reasonable men, seeking the truth, we cannot say that there is the
slightest doubt whatever on the subject. THE CONSTITUTION VERY
MATERIALLY SUPPORTS SLAVERY!
CHAPTER XVI.
NO UNION WITH SLAVEHOLDERS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account