Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1849-1853
Democrat, pleaded for it, argued for it, and most of them declared
themselves ready to fight for it; and yet Mr. Webster rises in his
place, and tells them they are all moonstruck, hallucinated, fatuous;
because “an ordinance of nature and the will of God” had settled this
question against them from the beginning of the world. Mr. Calhoun
said, immediately after this speech, “Give us free scope and time
enough, and we will take care of the rest.”
MR. MASON said,--
“We have heard here from various quarters, and from high quarters, and
repeated on all hands,--repeated here again to-day by the honorable
senator from Illinois, [Mr. SHIELDS,] that there is a law of nature
which excludes the southern people from every portion of the state
of California. I know of no such law of nature,--none whatever; but
I do know the contrary, that if California had been organized with a
territorial form of government only, and for which, at the last two
sessions of Congress, she has obtained the entire southern vote, the
people of the Southern States would have gone there freely, and have
taken their slaves there in great numbers. They would have done so,
because the value of the labor of that class would have been augmented
to them many hundred fold. Why, in the debates which took place in
the convention in California which formed the constitution, and which
any senator can now read for himself, after the provision excluding
slavery was agreed upon, it was proposed to prohibit the African
race altogether, free as well as bond. A debate arose upon it, and
the ground was distinctly taken, as shown in those debates, that if
the entire African race was not excluded, their labor would be found
so valuable that the owners of slaves would bring them there, even
though slavery were prohibited, under a contract to manumit them in
two or three years. And it required very little reasoning, on the
part of those opposed to this class of population, to show that the
productiveness of their labor would be such as to cause that result.
An estimate was gone into with reference to the value of the labor of
this class of people, showing that it would be increased to such an
extent in the mines of California, that they could not be kept out.
It was agreed that the labor of a slave in any one of the states from
which they would be taken, was not worth more than one hundred or one
hundred and fifty dollars a year, and that in California it would be
worth from four to six thousand dollars. They would work themselves
free in one or two years, and thus the country would be filled by
a class of free blacks, and their former owners have an excellent
bargain in taking them there.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account