Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1849-1853
DEAR SIR; In a speech delivered by you, in the House of
Representatives, in March last, I understood you to say that you
had been in the valley of the Great Salt Lake, and that you were
acquainted, from personal observation, with a large part of the
territory of California. Will you be so good as to give me your
opinion, and the reasons for entertaining it, of the probability or
improbability of the introduction of slave labor into any part of the
territory recently acquired by the United States from Mexico; provided
such introduction be not prohibited by law.
I wish to obtain your opinion in regard to other kinds of labor,
as well as agricultural; because, as it seems to me, a most
unwarrantable, if not a most disingenuous attempt has been made, to
lead the public to believe that no form of slave labor will ever
be introduced there, because, possibly, or probably, it may not be
introduced for agricultural purposes.
A reply at your earliest convenience will much oblige
Yours, very truly,
HORACE MANN.
WASHINGTON, June 10, 1850.
HON. HORACE MANN;
I received a note from you some days ago, making certain inquiries,
but which, up to this time, I have been unable to answer. I desire to
take no part in the question now dividing the country; but as you have
asked my judgment upon a matter which appears to be a disputed point,
I cannot, consistently with the law of courtesy, refuse you an answer.
That answer will be in conformity with what I have frequently said,
heretofore, in private conversation with gentlemen on this subject.
The point of inquiry seems to be, whether slave labor could be
profitably employed in Oregon, California, Utah, and New Mexico. If
the nature of the climate and resources of these countries are such
as to furnish a profitable market for slave labor, it appears to be
conceded, on all sides, that it would be introduced, if left free to
seek profitable investment, like other capital. The whole point at
issue, then, is dependent, as it is conceived, upon the determination
of the first point of inquiry. Hence, to that point, only, it is
necessary for me to confine my answer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account