Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1849-1853
It is very remarkable that such a man as Mr. Webster should furnish,
in the very quotation which he offers, the means of utterly confuting
the assertion which he makes. I suppose this can be accounted for only
on the ground, that he now occupies a position so antagonistic to that
which he has abandoned that he can hardly refer to his former views
without self-impeachment and self-conviction. Let passages from the two
speeches be placed side by side, to show, not their identity, but their
utter irreconcilability.
MARCH 23, 1848.
[_A passage quoted by himself._]
“It shall be _in the power_ of Congress hereafter to make _four_ other
new states out of Texan territory.”
MARCH 7, 1850.
“I wish it to be distinctly understood, to-day, that, according to my
view of the matter, this government _is solemnly pledged by law and
contract_ to create new states out of Texas,” &c. (p. 42.)
The first quotation only asserts a “power” in Congress to create new
states; the last affirms an obligation, “by law and contract,” to do
so. How could Mr. Webster have expected that this broad distinction
between _power_ and _duty_, between _option_ and _obligation_, could
escape the attention of his readers?
But there is another discrepancy or contradiction still more remarkable:
MARCH 23, 1848.
“It shall be in the power of Congress hereafter to make _four_ other
new states out of Texan territory.”
MARCH 7, 1850.
“----the guaranty is, that new states shall be made out of it, and
that such states as are formed out of that portion of Texas lying
south of 36° 30´, may come in as slave states to the number of _four_,
in addition to the state then in existence.” (p. 29.)
The first speech speaks of the _power_ of Congress, but the last of the
_obligation_ of Congress, to admit new states out of Texan territory.
The first speaks of “four other new states;” but the last of the
“guaranty” to admit “SLAVE states to the number of four.” Yet the first
speech is cited, to men who can read and write, as identical “in legal
construction and effect” with the last. The motto under which Danton
attempted to carry himself through his bloody career, was: “_L’audace,
l’audace, toujours l’audace_.” “Audacity, audacity, always audacity.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account