Smithsonian Institution - United States National Museum - Bulletin 249: Contributions from the Museum of History and Technology; Papers 52-54 on ArcheologyWatkins, C. Malcolm
Philosophy
Smithsonian Institution - United States National Museum - Bulletin 249: Contributions from the Museum of History and Technology; Papers 52-54 on Archeology
Watkins, C. Malcolm
Archaeology; Excavations (Archaeology) -- Virginia -- Gloucester County; Excavations (Archaeology) -- Virginia -- James City County; Excavations (Archaeology) -- Virginia -- Yorktown; Gloucester County (Va.) -- Antiquities; James City County (Va.) -- Antiquities; Yorktown (Va.) -- Antiquities
Index 113
Papers 52-54
On Archeology
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM
THE MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGY:
PAPER 52
EXCAVATIONS AT CLAY BANK
IN GLOUCESTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 1962-1963
_Ivor Noël Hume_
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 4
ARCHEOLOGICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL EVIDENCE 8
METHOD OF EXCAVATION 10
ARCHEOLOGICAL STRATIGRAPHY 11
THE ARTIFACTS 12
CONCLUSIONS 14
[Illustration: Figure 1.--DETAIL FROM AUGUSTINE HERMAN'S MAP OF
VIRGINIA which was published in 1673.]
_Ivor Noël Hume_
Excavations at
CLAY BANK
in Gloucester County, Virginia, 1962-1963
_This paper describes and analyzes artifacts recovered from
the Jenkins site at Clay Bank, Gloucester County, Virginia.
The building which overlay the excavated cellar hole does not
appear on any known map. Among the number of interesting objects
recovered was a large stem and foot from an elaborate drinking
glass or candlestick of fine quality English lead metal. It was
found in association with crude earthenwares, worn out tools,
and broken and reused clay tobacco pipes, suggesting that this
material was derived from various sources._
THE AUTHOR: _Ivor Noël Hume is director of archeology at Colonial
Williamsburg and an honorary research associate of the Smithsonian
Institution._
Early in January 1962 a brick foundation was discovered at Clay Bank
in Gloucester County following the removal of a walnut tree beside the
residence of Mr. William F. Jenkins. The tree was of no great antiquity
but the foundation beneath it was thought by Mr. Jenkins to be worthy
of archeological examination. The author, therefore, visited the site
late in the same month and found that the brick footings were certainly
of colonial date. From the small collection of ceramics and other
artifacts also exposed by the tree, there was reason to suppose that
the building had ceased to exist late in the 17th or perhaps early in
the 18th century.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account