Smuggling & Smugglers in Sussex: The Genuine History of the Inhuman and Unparalleled Murders of Mr. William Galley a Custom-house Officer, and Mr. Daniel Chater, a Shoemaker, by Fourteen Notorious Smugglers, with the Trials and Execution of Seven of the Criminals at Chichester, 1748-9Anonymous
History
Smuggling & Smugglers in Sussex: The Genuine History of the Inhuman and Unparalleled Murders of Mr. William Galley a Custom-house Officer, and Mr. Daniel Chater, a Shoemaker, by Fourteen Notorious Smugglers, with the Trials and Execution of Seven of the Criminals at Chichester, 1748-9
Anonymous
Crime -- England -- History; Smuggling -- England -- Sussex -- History
The prosecutor deposed that about six o’clock in the evening on the
31st of October, somebody knocked at the door, and on his servant going
to see who it was, four men rushed in, all disguised, with pistols and
cutlasses in their hands. When they came in they demanded money, and
asked him where his money was, upon which he desired they would be
easy, and he would give them what he had. But they put one over him,
and two of them went and rifled the house; and when they were gone he
missed the money, &c., mentioned in the indictment.
Thomas Rogers, an accomplice in the fact, was next called, who deposed
that he, the prisoners Stephen Diprose and James Bartlett, and John
Crumpton, not yet taken, agreed to go and get some money upon the
31st October, and accordingly came to a resolution to go and rob Mr.
Rich, of Linton. Accordingly they all set out, and when they came to
Mr. Rich’s door, Diprose knocked, and the door was soon opened, on
which they all rushed in with firearms and cutlasses in their hands,
and seized Mr. Rich and all his family, most of whom they bound, but
who they were in particular he could not tell; that those who were not
bound had one to stand guard over them, and two of the gang, Crumpton
and James Bartlett, rifled the house; and that he believed they took
away all the things mentioned in the indictment.
Being asked what he meant by saying he believed they took away all the
things mentioned in the indictment, said that they did not give him nor
Diprose a share of anything more than two gold rings and about seventy
pounds in money; but that since that time he had heard by Crumpton that
they took more money and goods at Mr. Rich’s of Linton, which he and
Bartlett had concealed.
Being asked if he was sure the prisoners at the bar were with him at
the commencement of the fact, he said that they all agreed to go to
Linton on purpose to rob Mr. Rich, imagining he had got a great deal of
cash by him in his house.
Several of Mr. Rich’s servants were then produced, who deposed to the
like effect of the thieves coming to their master’s house, and acting
in the manner as was before related by the evidence Rogers; and some of
them deposed further that the prisoners and Rogers were, they believed,
three of the four men by their size and voices, that robbed Mr. Rich’s
house, and bound most of his family. Here the proof for the prosecutor
was ended.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account