Smuggling & Smugglers in Sussex: The Genuine History of the Inhuman and Unparalleled Murders of Mr. William Galley a Custom-house Officer, and Mr. Daniel Chater, a Shoemaker, by Fourteen Notorious Smugglers, with the Trials and Execution of Seven of the Criminals at Chichester, 1748-9Anonymous
History
Smuggling & Smugglers in Sussex: The Genuine History of the Inhuman and Unparalleled Murders of Mr. William Galley a Custom-house Officer, and Mr. Daniel Chater, a Shoemaker, by Fourteen Notorious Smugglers, with the Trials and Execution of Seven of the Criminals at Chichester, 1748-9
Anonymous
Crime -- England -- History; Smuggling -- England -- Sussex -- History
The prisoners being called on to make their defence, had little or
nothing to say, only denied the fact, and said that Thomas Rogers was
a very wicked fellow, and that they knew nothing of him; and supposed
he swore this to get himself at liberty, and for the sake of the reward
that was to be paid on their conviction; but having no witnesses to
prove the contrary of what Rogers had sworn, and nobody appearing to
give them the character of honest men; and it likewise appearing by the
testimony of credible witnesses, that they and Rogers and Crumpton,
who stand indicted for the same, were all acquaintance, and frequently
together, and reputed all smugglers, the jury, without going out of
court, brought them both in Guilty. Death.
William Priggs and James Bartlett (the same Bartlett convicted
on the last indictment), were indicted for forcibly entering the
dwelling-house of John Wright, of Snave, in the county of Kent, and
taking from thence two bags of money containing 31_l._ 7s. 6d.
This fact was proved upon the prisoners by the prosecutor and his
servants, and Rogers an accomplice; the prosecutor deposing he knew the
prisoners again, and was sure they were the men that robbed him of the
two bags of money mentioned in the indictment; he further deposed that
when they came into his house they had all pistols and cutlasses in
their hands, and swore they came for money, and “D--n them,” money they
would have; that they bound him and his family, and one stood sentry
with a pistol cocked in his hand, while the others went upstairs and
took the money: that it was Priggs that stood sentry, while Bartlett
and Rogers went and took the money.
The prosecutor further deposed, that when they had got the two bags
which contained 31_l._ 7s. 6d., they swore they would blow his
brains out if he did not tell them where the rest of his money was, for
they were sure that was not all; that they would destroy the family if
they did not confess where there was more money; but upon his declaring
he had no more in the house, and they making him swear it, they went
away and, on going, said if they stirred for two hours, or attempted to
call out, they would murder them, and to that end should stay just by
to watch.
Thomas Rogers, the same witness as was against Bartlett and Diprose on
the last indictment, deposed that he and the two prisoners went and
committed the robbery at Mr. Wright’s house, at Snave, and bound Mr.
Wright and his family, and took the two bags of money mentioned in the
indictment; that they had crapes with them to put over their faces, but
did not put them on at the committing this robbery.
Several other witnesses were produced, who confirmed what had been
sworn by the prosecutor and Rogers the accomplice; and the prisoners
having nothing to say or prove in contradiction to the evidence that
had been given for the crown, only in general said they were innocent
of the crime laid to their charge, the jury brought them both in
Guilty. Death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account