Smuggling & Smugglers in Sussex: The Genuine History of the Inhuman and Unparalleled Murders of Mr. William Galley a Custom-house Officer, and Mr. Daniel Chater, a Shoemaker, by Fourteen Notorious Smugglers, with the Trials and Execution of Seven of the Criminals at Chichester, 1748-9Anonymous
History
Smuggling & Smugglers in Sussex: The Genuine History of the Inhuman and Unparalleled Murders of Mr. William Galley a Custom-house Officer, and Mr. Daniel Chater, a Shoemaker, by Fourteen Notorious Smugglers, with the Trials and Execution of Seven of the Criminals at Chichester, 1748-9
Anonymous
Crime -- England -- History; Smuggling -- England -- Sussex -- History
that this evil practice was the original cause of this murder, and then
he did not doubt but they would find the prisoners guilty.
Mr. Sergeant Wynn, after speaking of the nature of the crime, and that
it was one of the consequential evils that attended smuggling, observed
that most of the daring robberies that had been lately committed,
were by these sort of men, who thought, or at least acted, as if they
thought themselves above all law. That when they had called their
witnesses, he did not doubt but they would give the jury such evidence
as would induce them to believe the prisoners guilty, and consequently
find them so.
Henry Murril deposed that some time in January last was twelvemonth,
he was informed that some persons were at his house, enquiring after
some tea they had lost, but could not tell who they were; that he went
to young Cockrel’s, who keeps a public-house at Yapton; where he saw
Jerry Curtis and two others, drinking. Curtis was very angry; said some
rogues had stolen two bags of tea from him, and d--n him, he would find
it out, and severely punish those concerned therein; for d--n him,
he had whipt many a rogue, and washed his hands in their blood; that
Curtis had offered this deponent five guineas to get the tea again, or
find out who had got it; and then said that if money could not get it,
he would come sword in hand, and find it out and take it away.
Being asked by the court if the prisoner Mills was one of them that
were with Curtis, said he could not tell.
Henry Titcomb deposed that one day in January last was twelvemonth,
Curtis and Mills came to Mr. Boniface’s barn, where he, the prisoner,
and Richard Hawkins (the deceased) were at work; that Curtis called
Hawkins out to speak with him; that he did not hear what passed between
them, but that Hawkins went away with them; that a little while after,
the same afternoon, he saw Hawkins riding behind Mills from Walberton
towards Slindon, and never saw Hawkins the deceased afterwards.
John Saxby deposed that he was a servant to Cockrel the elder, of
Walberton; that the day Hawkins (the deceased) was missing, Curtis,
Mills, and Hawkins came to his master’s house and drank together; that
at going away, Mills bid Hawkins get up behind him, which he at first
refused, saying he would not, without making a sure bargain; that they
bid him get up for they would satisfy him, which Hawkins did; and this
deponent never saw the deceased afterwards.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account