Social legislation and social activity : $b being addresses delivered at the sixth annual meeting of the American academy of political and social science of Philadelphia — John Shaqi
Social legislation and social activity : $b being addresses delivered at the sixth annual meeting of the American academy of political and social science of PhiladelphiaAmerican Academy of Political and Social Science
History
Social legislation and social activity : $b being addresses delivered at the sixth annual meeting of the American academy of political and social science of Philadelphia
American Academy of Political and Social Science
Arbitration, Industrial; Child labor; Child labor -- United States; Factory laws and legislation -- United States; Housing -- United States; Juvenile courts; Labor -- United States
Second.—The accomplishment of their object requires labor organizations
to secure the membership of the largest number of persons employed in
any kindred trade, and (because voluntary advancement of wages rarely or
never occurs) to demand a change in wages and betterment in conditions
whenever it appears that the need for their labor is in excess of the
supply, and therefore warrants such demand. Labor organizations are
necessary also to resist collectively any movement on the part of the
employer which would result in injury to the workingman.
Third.—Whenever labor organizations by reason of false leaders have made
unfair demands or established conditions which were unfair to the
employer, it has been because of the use of collective force against the
individual employer, and this has been defeated whenever the employers
have organized similar associations for their own defence.
Fourth.—That strikes for advance in wages and improvement of
condition—occurring, as they do, during a period of prosperity—usually
succeed, while strikes for recognition of the union, usurpation of the
rights of the employer or against the reduction of wages almost
invariably fail in their purpose.
Assuming that the employer is governed by honesty of purpose in dealing
with labor, and that the employee is equally honest in his desire to
give worth for wages, the organization of both parties must slowly but
surely remove force as the means of securing results, and cause a resort
to reason and conciliation as the best means to accomplish the greatest
value for both.
There are two great obstacles which prevent the substitution of these
means of settling the labor question at present, and which must be first
removed before better conditions can be realized.
On the part of the employer there is the refusal (usually sentimental)
to recognize the union, and the determination to destroy it. He forgets
that his effort to destroy the union presupposes his recognition of it,
else he would be fighting a nightmare, while the recognition in fact
would enable him to learn its scope, purposes, and plans, and by
co-operation secure a valuable ally instead of an unreasonable enemy.
In the use of the word union, I desire always to be understood to refer
to such organizations of workingmen as are conducted along reasonable
lines and are led by representatives worthy of the best element
composing the membership, who formulate their demands in harmony with
known business conditions and control their movements within the lines
of law and order, because when they assume any other condition they are
simply mobs, and deserve only the condemnation of every worthy citizen.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account