Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
One thing realised by every child born in East Anglia is that he is not
one of those inferior people who are born in the “Shires.” His native
land is not called after any town, Northampton, Bedford, Leicester,
or Cambridge: he belongs to a race, not to a territorial division,
invented less than a thousand years ago. He and his kinsmen, the
North folk, are East Anglians; and the rest of the world are to him
“furriners,” or people who came from the “Sheeres.” Not that he is an
unmixed race--far from it. The peasantry were in the land long before
the Angles arrived. They are a small dark people, who have survived
countless invasions and will probably outlive modern civilisation.
When you see them beating a field or covert for game and kill hares
and rabbits by throwing their sticks with unerring aim, you feel that
they do much as their ancestors did before the dawn of history. The
Anglian is a big blond man slow of speech and apparently somewhat
dull, but in a bargain he is seldom the loser. The little town of
Hadleigh was once the capital of Alfred’s rival, Guthrum, the Dane;
and the Norse origin of many families reveals itself in Grimwood,
Grimwade, Grimsey, and Grimes. Flemings and Dutch, French Huguenots,
have all contributed to the population of East Anglia; but despite
the blending of nationalities there is a strong feeling of a common
tie binding all these heterogeneous elements together. Yet there are
curious local divisions existing to this day. The eastern and western
parts of the county are at constant feud. When the county councils were
established in the ‘eighties,’ Suffolk had to be divided into East
and West, because the two would not work together. When last year the
county was made a single diocese, Ipswich would not allow the ancient
western monastic town of Bury St. Edmunds to give the bishop his
title; and Bury St. Edmunds scorned to submit to the richer but less
aristocratic Ipswich. So in desperation the diocese had to be called
‘St. Edmundsbury and Ipswich.’
To look at an Ordnance map one would say that Suffolk was very flat
and eminently agricultural. The highest hill I could find was 402
feet above the sea; seldom does the land rise over 200 feet. Yet a
motor drive in Suffolk gives one the sensation of having been on a
switchback railway. One is never on the level, and some of the little
ascents and descents are very sharp. The beautiful church towers
are usually on hills and the churches are often placed outside the
villages. The road or ‘street’ (Roman _stratum_) on each side of which
the hamlet stands frequently runs up a hill. The lanes are narrow and
muddy; and at the bottom of a hill often waterlogged. Communication
must have been exceedingly difficult--a fact which explains many
peculiarities of the people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account