Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
The two tutors, Mr. Parkinson and Mr. Seale, were in a sense men of
mark. The former had been disappointed in failing to be elected Master;
and was engaged to a very beautiful young lady, whose numerous admirers
made him at times uncomfortable. As Mr. Parkinson had an eighteen-mile
ride to get to his lady-love, he lectured in cap and gown, but also
booted and spurred, and snubbed young Gunning when he asked for
explanations of difficult points in the lecture.
Accordingly his pupil gave up lectures and decided not to read at
all; but at the end of the term the tutor spoke most kindly and
encouragingly, as an old friend of his pupil’s father. The result was
that Gunning became, for a time at least, a reading man, and was
much encouraged by his friend Hartley, a Yorkshireman who shewed him
the solution of the difficulties which Parkinson was too impatient to
explain. When Parkinson examined Gunning he found that his progress
was most satisfactory, encouraged him most kindly to persist; and when
Gunning told him of a man who was reputed to read twelve hours a day
in hopes of surpassing the expected Senior Wrangler, he remarked, “If
he mean to beat him he had better devote six hours to reading and six
hours to reflecting on what he has read.”
Seale, the other tutor, was a good teacher and a really humorous
lecturer. “Nothing could be pleasanter than the hour passed at his
lecture, such was his kindness to all.... When any ludicrous blunder
occurred ... he joined in the laugh as heartily as any of us.” Seale
seems to have been a very able scholar, but somewhat quarrelsome: he
became chaplain to the Archbishop of Canterbury; but had to resign
because he quarrelled with the butler about the wine supplied at the
chaplains’ table. However, Gunning had nothing to complain of in regard
to the education he got from his college.
He was not always a close student; and both his diversions and his
friends are more interesting in illustrating his times, than are his
tutors or his reading. May I for a moment digress and explain the
constitution of the University? Except for a very few professors and
the officials--Vice-Chancellor, Proctors, Taxors, and Moderators,
etc.--the University was practically non-existent. The colleges did
virtually all the teaching and were self-contained bodies.[21]
A man got little or no instruction outside his own college; the
University examined him and gave him his degree--that was all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account