Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
The real rulers of the University were the Masters of the colleges.
Most of them were highly placed ecclesiastics, and, consequently,
had frequently to be absent from Cambridge; but as the “Heads” might
marry, and fellows had to resign their position on taking a wife, they
constituted a permanent element, and became all-powerful. I myself have
often heard stories of the time when the Master of a college, and his
family, belonged to an aristocracy to which no ordinary Master of Arts
could hope to be admitted; and, you may be sure, the ladies who reigned
in the lodges were very careful to keep the wives and daughters of
such married graduates as happened to live in the town at their proper
distance. Gunning will have plenty to say about them. The fellows of
the colleges were for the most part non-resident; only the tutors and
a few old men resided with any permanence in the colleges. With a
few exceptions the fellows who stayed in Cambridge were either very
young men or very strange old bachelors who seldom left the town. What
instruction was given was given by the college tutors, and most of
the fellows who lived in Cambridge served as curates to the different
village churches. Some were almost entirely idle men, and one, who
shall be nameless, found them no little mischief to do.
The fellows dined at the high table, to which the nobility were also
admitted. Noblemen, _i.e._ peers, the eldest sons of peers, and men
who could prove royal descent, had till comparatively recently had the
right of proceeding to the degree of M.A. after two years of residence
without taking any examination or the degree of B.A. In Gunning’s early
days peers wore on state occasions a magnificent academical dress
varying in colour according to taste. Then came the fellow-commoners,
men of wealth, who paid far higher fees than the ordinary students
and dined with the fellows. These were also distinguished by the
magnificence of their academic attire. It is difficult to imagine a
much worse system of education. The nobility and fellow-commoners
were kept apart from the ordinary men, often grossly flattered by
the fellows and even by the Masters of the colleges. Work was not
expected of them, and their example was often pernicious alike to the
students and to the younger fellows. The majority of the young men
were classed as scholars, who with the fellows formed what is called
the “society” of the colleges, pensioners, and sizars or servitors.
Almost all were intending to take Holy Orders: a few, however, became
barristers or medical practitioners. The University was very small. In
1748 there were only 1500 on the books of the colleges; this includes
non-residents, who were almost certainly in the majority. In 1801
the total of residents in the University, including, I suppose, the
servants who slept in college, was 803.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account