Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
which the bowl circulated freely and the fun was fast and furious. His
powerful personality dominated the University, as may be seen from the
fact that he did his best to stop the reform of Trinity College. In his
account of this Mr. Gunning draws a striking picture of the Seniority
of the college in the closing years of the eighteenth century. By its
statutes Trinity was practically governed by the Master and the ten
Senior Fellows, the latter men who had lived for years in the college
without generally doing any work, being content with holding their
fellowship and living in celibate idleness. Their power was great;
and, as it may well be supposed, they were not as a rule qualified to
exercise it, especially when they claimed a right to select the fellows
themselves without regard to the reports of the examiners. The tutors
fought a hard battle to remove this abuse and were taunted by Milner
and the Tory party with being Jacobites and supporters of the French
Revolution. The matter was decided in the courts, and the tutors won,
with the result that a fellowship at Trinity became, in Macaulay’s
words, a veritable “patent of nobility.”
I abbreviate Gunning’s description of the Seniority partly from a sense
of propriety.
The Rev. Stephen Whiston, B.D., was, says our author, “I believe a very
respectable man.”
The Rev. Samuel Backhouse, B.D., kept a girls’ school at a village
called Balsham.
“Was it profit that he sought?
No; he paid them to be taught.
Had he honour for his aim?
No; he _blushed to find it fame_.”
The Rev. Samuel Peck, B.D., must have been rather a nice old man. He
was a great authority on village law and helped the country people
gratis, saying, “Sam Peck never takes a fee, but he loves gratitude,”
and the farmers paid him in presents of the produce of their land. He
played a very clever trick upon Gunning’s old tutor Seale by persuading
him to share the expenses of treating two ladies on a journey from
London to Cambridge, who turned out to be his own cook and waitress![23]
The Rev. Thomas Wilson, B.D., had to have his garden key taken away
because he was rude to the Master’s wife one dark evening when she was
returning from a party.
The Rev. John Higgs, B.D., and the Rev. Thomas Spencer, B.D., were
unknown to Gunning. Mr. Spencer was mad, and only came to Cambridge
when his vote was wanted. The Rev. William Collier, B.D., was a
well-known gourmand. He is recorded to have eaten three-quarters of a
sucking pig and to have left the rest because he was engaged to dine
immediately after. He was a Hebrew scholar, a good classic, and a
modern linguist. The Rev. James Lambert was an excellent sportsman and
was supposed to be unorthodox. “Lambert was never addicted to those
vices for which at that time the Seniors of Trinity were so notorious,
but when in college attended closely to literary pursuits.” He was
Professor of Greek.
Observe, except Lambert all were B.D.’s. Here is an epitaph:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account