Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
The home of the family was amid the fens of Lincolnshire; and the
fenland had still many of its peculiar characteristics during the
childhood and youth of the Wesleys. The Isle of Axholm had been but
recently literally an island, rising out of the swamps and often
approached only by boat. These islands were inhabited by a wild uncouth
race who lived partly as farmers, and partly by capturing the fish and
birds which swarmed in the surrounding fens. Here lived John Wesley and
his family. By birth they were emphatically gentlefolk, by education
highly cultivated; they were miserably poor, severed from the society
of their equals among a people with whom they could have but little
sympathy. All of a deeply religious spirit; the father a pious and
conscientious but disappointed scholar, the mother sternly determined
to do her duty, the sons endowed with singular gifts of leadership,
the daughters sensitive and refined, condemned to live as peasant
girls. A family so able, so thrown on its own resources, so out of
contact with the world, of so imperious a spirit, was almost bound to
develop on exceptional lines. Their virtues and their strength were as
abnormal as their weakness, their singularly active minds were equally
capable of the greatest deeds and the most surprising mistakes. All
the girls were unfortunate in the choice of their partners and had sad
lives. John, the most gifted of all this gifted household, was able
to transform England by his preaching; yet made the most astonishing
blunders in the conduct of his private life, though shewing a talent
for administration worthy of his celebrated namesake, Arthur Wesley,
or Wellesley, Duke of Wellington. In studying the movement we must
always keep Epworth in the background.[1] But there was another side
of the life of the sons of the Rector. Samuel’s friend Atterbury,
the Tory Bishop of Rochester, is one of the most remarkable figures
of his age. John and Charles at Oxford were poor enough but found a
welcome in society congenial to them. Their birth and manners gave them
access to a coterie of religious yet cultured circles, especially at
Stanton in Gloucestershire; and they always comported themselves with
a consciousness of a perfectly secure position in society. Neither of
them was in the slightest degree dazzled by rank, wealth, or worldly
position. When Count Zinzendorf, the great German noble, and the patron
of the Moravians, spoke with the authority of a pious prince to John,
he was answered in a spirit as uncompromising as his own. Selina,
the famous and pious Countess of Huntingdon, “the elect lady” of
evangelical preachers, might patronise Whitefield; but could not take
a high tone with the Wesleys. Indeed, the aristocracy who preferred
the treasure of the Gospel to be contained in clergy, who might be
described as “earthen vessels,” disliked the Wesleys, whose greatest
successes were obtained among the middle class. None the less their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account