Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
To do George justice, his wife does not seem to have been attractive.
He had excellent taste in dress and deportment; and Caroline was far
from being a model of refinement in appearance or manners, whilst her
choice of company was never discreet. The old King always treated
her with kindness and even affection, but he found it necessary to
warn her to be more careful in the selection of her society. In 1804
the Prince of Wales instituted a “Delicate Enquiry,” which four
Lords were appointed to conduct, with the result that the behaviour
of the Princess was pronounced not _un_satisfactory. In the years
which followed there were constant quarrels and recriminations about
the education of their daughter, the Princess Charlotte of Wales,
a high-spirited girl who stood up boldly to the ill treatment she
received at her father’s hands, and defended her mother. In 1814 the
Princess of Wales left England for her famous travels. Two years later
the Princess Charlotte married Leopold of Saxe-Coburg, and settled down
at Claremont, a beautiful place purchased for her by the nation. The
young couple were thoroughly happy, the people looked forward to being
one day ruled over by a beloved and virtuous queen. The incredible
scandals of the family of George III were being forgotten, when the
news came that the Princess was dead.
I shall _never_ get to the trial! I must digress once more. What ensued
was almost farcical. Despite the fact that George III had an immense
family, he had no grandchildren. All his elderly sons hastened to get
married. The Prince Regent was very little married to his wife, and
very much so to various other ladies; the Duke of York had married
happily, and was, if not always faithful, a kindly husband; but he had
no family. The Duke of Cumberland had married a princess of whom the
royal family disapproved, and perhaps he was more hated by the nation
than any member of the house of Hanover. Among other things, many
firmly believed that he was really guilty of the murder of his servant,
Sellis. The idea of his coming to the throne was dreaded on all sides.
But there was no lack of _nominally_ unmarried Royal Dukes,--Clarence,
Sussex, Kent, and Cambridge. The nearest persons to the succession,
who had families, were the King of Würtemburg, his brother, and their
sister the Princess Frederica Buonaparte. It became necessary for the
Royal Dukes to take wives in accordance with the Royal Marriage Act of
1772;[27] and, though they had not only themselves but other ladies and
their children to consider, these noble princes presented themselves
at the altar of Hymen. Not, however, without some forethought, as the
following remarks of the Duke of Kent to his friend Mr. Creevey testify:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account