Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
Sam Weller’s story of his father and the voters had more point in those
days than now. Mr. Weller was offered a twenty-pound note ($100) and
it was suggested that if the coach were overturned by the bank of a
canal it might be a good thing. Strangely enough an accident happened.
To quote Sam’s words: “You wouldn’t believe it, sir,” continued Sam,
with a look of inexpressible impudence at his master, “that on the
wery day he came down with those voters, his coach _was_ upset on that
’ere wery spot, and every man of them was turned into the canal.” In
the unreformed Parliament, before 1832, the boroughs had each its own
peculiar electorate; and I am glad to use for my information a book
written by two learned scholars now in America, Mr. and Mrs. Porritt.
In not a few places the election of members was vested in the Mayor
and burgesses, in others the different guilds and corporations were
the electors. In one case the franchise was more democratic even than
now, the very tramps who slept in the town of Preston became voters.
Not infrequently the members were nominated by a local magnate. In many
cases the town sold its nomination to the highest bidder; and this
was occasionally the case at Eatandswill, if so be that it represents
Sudbury. But frequently the electors were the so-called “freemen” of
the borough. The name takes us back to mediæval times, when slavery was
in existence, or to the days when the guilds were close corporations,
and no one not free of them could practise any trade. But in later
times the freedom was a matter of inheritance and could even be
taken up, in some cases, by marriage with a “freeman’s” daughter.
The franchise in many towns was enjoyed only by these freemen, and
in Ipswich, to take an example familiar to me, most of them were
non-resident.
In an election in the “twenties,” which is reputed to have cost the
candidates £30,000 ($150,000), I have been told that they chartered
ships to bring electors from Holland. This is, doubtless, why all
the hotels in Eatandswill were crowded, and explains the elder Mr.
Weller’s adventure by the canal. Bribery was illegal; and in a famous
case in 1819 Sir Manasseh Massey Lopez was fined £10,000 ($50,000) and
imprisoned for two years for practising it at Grampound. But it was an
exceptional case; and the Lords threw out the bill for disfranchising
the borough.
Now we are on the subject of political life I cannot resist reminding
you of a perfectly delightful sketch of a political fraud in the
person of Mr. Gregsbury in “Nicholas Nickleby.” He comes into the story
for no particular reason except to give Dickens the joy of describing
the sort of man he had doubtless observed when he was a pressman in the
House of Commons.
Nicholas is present when the deputation arrives to request Mr.
Gregsbury to resign his seat, and Mr. Pugstyles is its spokesman.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account