Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
“‘My conduct, Pugstyles,’ said Mr. Gregsbury, looking round upon
the deputation with gracious magnanimity, ‘my conduct has been, and
ever will be, regulated by a sincere regard for this great and happy
country. Whether I look at home, or abroad; whether I behold the
peaceful industrious communities of our island home: her rivers covered
with steamboats, her road with locomotives, her streets with cabs, her
skies with balloons of a power and magnitude hitherto unknown in the
history of aëronautics--I say whether I look at home, etc., etc., I
clasp my hands, and, turning my eyes to the broad expanse above my
head, exclaim, Thank God I am a Briton.’” When even this outburst does
not meet with approval and the deputation presses Mr. Gregsbury to
resign, the member reads a letter he has addressed to Mr. Pugstyles
in which he says, “Actuated by no personal motives, but moved only by
high and great constitutional considerations ... I would rather keep my
seat, and intend doing so.” No, in all the changes time has brought,
one thing does not change--our politicians are still the same.
In “Our Mutual Friend” our author touches once more on the state of the
poor and their terror of “the parish.” No one who has read this novel,
with its wealth of characters amazing even for Dickens--for even in his
other works you fail to find so many types as Bella Wilfer, Mr. and
Mrs. Boffin, Fascination Fledgby, the dolls’ dressmaker, Mr. Silas
Wegg, Mr. Venus, Rogue Riderhood, the Veneerings, to mention only a
few--no one, I say, can ever forget the old washerwoman Betty Higden
and her horror of the workhouse, how it haunted her whole life and gave
an additional terror to death, that thereby she would fall into the
hands of the parish and be buried by it. And in this novel Dickens is
as severe on the injudicious charity of philanthropists and faddists as
he is upon the callousness of the guardians of the poor. There is no
more terrible satire on the mistakes of the education of that age than
his delineation of Bradley Headstone. I have never to my recollection
read any discussion of this character but I have often thought that in
Headstone and Charley Hexam, his pupil, he is giving a warning of the
dangers of modern education.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account