Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
Universal education was not yet adopted in England, which was the
most backward of countries in this respect. But it was in the air,
and Dickens foresaw that some of the principles adopted would prove
serious to the community. He dwells on the mechanical efficiency of
the teaching; the learning to write essays on any subject exactly one
slate long, for example; on the miscellaneous and useless information
imparted; on a Bible teaching which has nothing to do with vital
religion. Dickens recognised that the education of all classes was
killing individuality, and not fostering moral or spiritual qualities.
He recognised that in the type of Charley Hexam it was encouraging a
desire for “respectability,” consisting, not in taking one’s coat off
to work, but in working in a black coat, which was killing the finer
feelings in which the poor often shew to the advantage of the rich. And
in Bradley Headstone Dickens points out, that all this smug education
was powerless to restrain the elemental ferocity of human nature in
the schoolmaster, who looked natural in Rogue Riderhood’s clothes,
and not himself in his decent black coat. There was latent in him all
the ferocity of a hardened criminal; and recent events are shewing how
powerless education is really to civilise the heart of man.
I have spoken of the need of a map of London to understand Dickens,
and I shall now take an extract from “Oliver Twist” to illustrate this
remark. Oliver has just met with John Dawkins, otherwise the Artful
Dodger, who offered to take him to a lodging. “It was nearly eleven
o’clock when they reached the turnpike at Islington. They crossed from
the Angel into St. John’s Road; struck down the small street which
terminates at Sadlers Wells Theatre; through Exmouth Street and Coppice
Row; down the little court by the side of the workhouse; across the
classic ground which once bore the name of Hockley in the Hole, thence
to little Saffron Hill the Great and so on to when they reached the
bottom of the hill, his (Oliver’s) conductor, catching him by the arm,
pushed open the door of a house near Field Lane.”
Now I almost defy anyone to find all these localities in a modern map.
You would have, in the first place, to start in the middle of London at
the Angel at Islington. Sadlers Wells is now in the midst of a network
of streets. It was only when I turned to Northcock’s history of London,
which has a good map dated 1772, that all was plain. Islington was a
village outside London; Sadlers Wells a suburban resort; Exmouth street
was not yet built;[30] but Coppice row, Hockley in the Hole, and of
course Saffron Hill and Field Lane, were all easily found.
In speaking of this great delineator of human character as now needing
explanation and comment, I have no doubt that he belongs to that small
group of writers whose works belong to all ages. We hear complaints in
England that young people do not read him; and the same were made when
we were young.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account