[Footnote 17: The late Major Powell, of the American Bureau of Ethnology, used _gens_ of a totem kin with descent in the male line, _clan_ of such a kin with descent in the female line, and his school follows him. Mr. Howitt, on the other hand, uses ‘horde’ for a local community with female, ‘clan’ for a local community with male descent.] [Footnote 18: ‘The Seri Indians,’ by W. J. McGee. _Report of Bureau of American Ethnology_, Washington, 1898.] [Footnote 19: ‘Siouan Sociology,’ _Report of American Ethnological Bureau_, 1897, p. 213.] [Footnote 20: _Studies in Ancient History_, second series, p. 265.] [Footnote 21: _Studies in Ancient History_, second series, p. 46. In an appendix to Mr. _Morgan’s Ancient Society_, Mr. McLennan’s terms are severely criticised.] [Footnote 22: I shall call each set indicated by a totem name a ‘totem group,’ if the members live together; a ‘totem kin,’ if they are scattered through the tribe.] [Footnote 23: _The Patriarchal Theory_, pp. 6, 7, 1885.] [Footnote 24: Meaning by Exogamy, not a mere tendency to marry out of the group, but a customary law with a religious sanction.] [Footnote 25: Here the unusual case of the Arunta offers an exception to the rule; a point to be discussed later.] [Footnote 26: Spencer and Gillen, pp. 8-10.] [Footnote 27: _Ibid_. pp. 8-9.] [Footnote 28: ‘Remarks on Totemism,’ _Jour. Anthrop. Inst._, August, November, 1898.] [Footnote 29: _Kinship in Early Arabia_, p. 187.] [Footnote 30: But, as Dr. Durkheim says, man and wife might soon abandon each other, if familiarity breeds contempt.] [Footnote 31: _Journal of the Anthropological Institute_, May, 1895, p. 444.] [Footnote 32: _Kamilaroi and Kurnai_, p. 132. 1880.] [Footnote 33: Spencer and Gillen, p. 70. Frazer, _Fortnightly Review_, April, May, 1899.] [Footnote 34: _The Mystic Rose_, p. 460.] [Footnote 35: _History of Human Marriage_, pp. 105-113.] [Footnote 36: Tylor, _J. A. I._ xviii. 3, 254.] [Footnote 37: The practice however, is attributed to tame canary birds.] [Footnote 38: _Studies in Ancient History_, second series, pp. 57-65.] [Footnote 39: Cf. _Custom and Myth_ (A. L.), p. 258.] [Footnote 40: _Mystic Rose_, p. 31.] [Footnote 41: Spencer and Gillen, pp. 92-93.] [Footnote 42: Lord Avebury’s view that the ‘rite’ implies compensation to the other males of the community will be considered later.] [Footnote 43: Westermarck, p. 13. Citing Brehm, ‘Thierleben,’ i. 97, _Proceedings R.G.S._ xvi. 177.] [Footnote 44: _Mystic Rose_, p. 443.] [Footnote 45: Westermarck, p. 292.] [Footnote 46: _Mystic Rose_, p. 222.] [Footnote 47: _Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia_, p. 170.] [Footnote 48: _Proc. Roy. Soc. N.S.W._ xxxi. 166.] [Footnote 49: _Kamilaroi and Kurnai_, pp. 42,46, 47, 115.] [Footnote 50: _Mystic Rose_, p. 443.] [Footnote 51: See _Studies in Ancient History_, pp. 183-186.]