It seems doubtful whether we can admit that there is any such clear
circumscription of the pecuniary field. All values are interrelated, and
it may reasonably be held that none can stand apart and be wholly
incommensurable with the others. The idea of a common measure which, for
certain purposes at least, may be applied to _all_ values is by no means
absurd. The argument that such a measure is possible may be stated
somewhat as follows.
Since the function of values is to guide conduct, they are in their
nature comparable. Conduct is a matter of the total or synthetic
behavior of a living whole in view of a situation: it implies the
integration of all the motives bearing on the situation. Accordingly
when a crisis in conduct arises the values relating to it, no matter how
incommensurable they may seem, are in some way brought to a common
measure, weighed against one another, in order to determine which way
the scale inclines. This commensuration is psychical, not numerical, and
we are far from understanding its exact nature, but unless each
pertinent kind of value has a part in it of some sort it would seem that
the mind is not acting as a vital whole. If there were absolute values
that cannot be impaired or in any way influenced by the opposing action
of other values, they must apparently exist in separate compartments and
not in organic relation to the rest of the mind. It does not follow that
what we regard as a high motive, such as the sense of honor, must
necessarily be overcome by a sufficient accumulation of lower motives,
such as sensuous desires, but we may be prepared to find that if the two
are opposed the latter will, in one way or another, modify the conduct
required by the former, and this I believe is usually the fact. Thus
suppose a lower value, in the shape of temptation, is warring against a
higher in the shape of an ideal. Even if we concede nothing to the
former, even if we react far away from it, none the less it has entered
into our life and helped to mould it—as sensuality, for example, helps
to mould the ascetic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account