Our great lack, as regards higher discipline, has been that we have had
no habitual and moving vision of our State. There has been a great deal
of a vague kind of patriotism, but it has generally lacked specific
ideal, purpose, and form. The ingrained habit of regarding government as
a minor part of life, a necessary evil, and the pursuit of second-rate
men, has diverted the spiritual energies of our people from public
channels, not only impairing our national life and discrediting
democracy, but leaving the individual without that sense of public
function which his own character requires. The religious ardor which men
willingly give to their country when they feel their identity with it is
the noblest basis for discipline, and it remains for us to find a means
of arousing this other than the gross and obsolescent one of threatened
war. We need, along with the growth of freedom and enlightenment, a
growing vision of the nation as the incarnation of our ideal, as an
upbuilder of great enterprises, as a friend and benefactor of other
nations, and as an honorable contestant in an international struggle for
leadership in industry, science, art, and every sort of higher service.
This might, perhaps, be made the motive for some sort of universal
service and training in connection with the schools, which should be as
peaceful in spirit as the times permit, though capable of taking a
warlike direction if necessary. What a state like Germany has done by
the aid of militarism and bureaucracy, yet with a large measure of
success, we ought to do in our own way, and do much better.
Our discipline needs to be as diverse as our society. A well-organized
plan of life should embrace a system of disciplinary groups
corresponding to the chief aspects of human endeavor, each one
surrounding the individual with an atmosphere of emulation and with
ideals of a particular sort. Democracy should not mean uniformity, but
the fullest measure of differentiation, a development everywhere of
special spirits—in communities, in occupations, in culture groups, in
distinctive personalities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account