Soil and Water Pollution : Presented to the American Public Health Association at New Orleans, Dec. 1880Runnels, M. T. (Moses Thurston)
Science
Soil and Water Pollution : Presented to the American Public Health Association at New Orleans, Dec. 1880
Runnels, M. T. (Moses Thurston)
Water -- Pollution; Water-supply -- Indiana -- Indianapolis
As yet none has been found having a scientific basis. But let us see
how this water would be rated by some of the standards of men who have
justly distinguished themselves by their labor in water analysis. The
Grenzzahlen limitary numbers are of E. Reichardt, Kubel, and Tiemann
and Fischer.
One litre (1,000 cubic centimetres).
===================================================================
| | KUBEL AND |
| REICHARDT. | TIEMANN. | FISCHER.
---------------+--------------+--------------------+---------------
Nitric acid | | |
anhyd. | 4 milligramm.| 5 to 15 milligramm.| 27 milligramm.
Chlorine |28 ” |20 to 30 ” | 35 ”
Lime (CaO.) | | |112 ”
Magnesia (MgO.)| | | 40 ”
Degrees of | | |
hardness | | |
(German) |18 ” |18 to 20 ” | 17 ”
===================================================================
This water contains in milligrammes per litre: Nitric Acid Anhyd.
10.72; Chlorine, 92.18; Lime, 14.8; Magnesia, 41; degrees of hardness
(German), 20.596.
The limitary quantity of organic matter in 100 c. c. should not exceed
that necessary for the deoxidation of K Mn 04 in 2 c. c. of the 1-100
normal solution. This is given by Fresenius. For 100 c. c. of this
water 3.11 c. c. of the 1-100 normal solution was required. The organic
matter in the water is considerable, yet is no doubt variable in
quantity. On account of the quantity of the organic matter, by exposure
to the air doubtless many other species of infusoria would be formed.
The water is hard and by chemical technologists would be condemned, as
with them 10 degrees German, or 12.5 degrees English, is the limit.
The ammonia is in a mere trace, yet accurately estimated as given.
Nearly all rain water contains more. I have estimated the chlorine
in water sent on Thursday last (by the volumetric method), and found
0.05992 gramme chlorine in one litre. This makes a difference of 0.0322
gramme chlorine as found in one litre of the water of the first bottle
sent. In what way could there be such a great increase or rather
decrease of the chlorides? Are there any privy vaults or slaughter
houses near the source of the water? May I ask where this water was
obtained?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account