United States -- History, Military; United States. Army -- History
correspond to a few days on a football squad. Washington and Steuben
couldn’t count on what material they could coach or could have for any
one game. Green Americans against expert British, were the rule. If
you can picture a coach on any gridiron receiving from the farm or the
store a new set of men every two days, with most of the old set leaving
at the same time, and attempting to produce a team for a game each
Saturday, you have in a mild way Washington’s situation. We know that
when we put untrained and unconditioned men into a football game, we
reap more serious injuries than if the men are hardened and trained.
If those casualties exist where the human body is the only weapon, how
_much more_ unspeakable are the added injuries where bad weather, poor
shelter, loss of food and sleep, bullets and cannon balls were the
weapons. So in the Revolution we put men in a more terrible plight than
we’d think of allowing even in modern football.
But a more surprising thing is what we did after the war was over.
We dismissed our entire coaching staff and all of the squad except
80 men, who just worked around the training quarters and received no
practice or instruction in the game. Our people had the idea that
there would never be another game. They contended that any attempt at
a continuous coaching system with a paid staff was getting back to
professionalism--to despotism and tyranny. Since armies in Europe were
playthings of Kings, then all armies would be that way. They took the
same line of reasoning as the man who says, “Since some church members
are hypocrites, then all churches are wrong.” Washington tried his
best with all his pleading and logic, to show how false was such a
view. He begged and advised in so many of his letters and testaments
that it seems nothing could be more important to him. He wrote of the
Revolution: “Had we formed a permanent army in the beginning--we should
not have been the greatest part of the war inferior to the enemy,
indebted for our safety to their inactivity, enduring frequently the
mortification of seeing opportunities to ruin them pass unimproved for
the want of a force, which the country was completely able to afford;
and of seeing the country ravaged, our towns burnt, the inhabitants
plundered, abused, murdered with impunity from the same cause.” He also
wrote, “To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of
preserving peace.” Henry Lee, Governor of Virginia about the same time
went further. “Convinced as I am that a government is the murderer of
its citizens which sends them to the field uninformed and untaught,
where they are to meet men of the same age and strength, mechanized by
education and discipline for battle, I cannot withhold my denunciation
of its wickedness and folly.”
Thus the people were warned against their slump--and we shall soon see
how they paid for it.
_V_
THE FIELD MEET
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account