United States -- History, Military; United States. Army -- History
The situation in Mexico was so perilous that Sheridan was torn away
before the Grand Review in Washington, and sent immediately south. When
he arrived near the Rio Grande, the republican force in Mexico was
weak, worn and scattered. But it wasn’t hopeless long. For Sheridan
had something--we had something we’d never before had--a decent
sized, trained force. Even if it had been expensively trained under
the bullet, it was trained and well-trained. Sheridan just sat down in
Texas with almost three corps, and peered threateningly into Mexico.
Maximilian knew there wasn’t anything he had which could overcome such
a force. Little by little under the American display of strength, the
republicans gained power. In a year and a half the Empire fell, without
a single American gun being fired and with no bloodshed for us. We had
gained our ends by merely a show of force. Here is something for our
histories to brag about. Why do they cover it over with a sham? You
remember experts said that if we had had twenty-five thousand trained
men in 1860, the Civil War could not have lasted more than three
months. Well that statement, however careful, is at best theory, but
taken with the example of Sheridan’s force, it becomes a fact. And
there are other examples in our history where a sufficiently trained
force prevented bloodshed. The only reason we haven’t had more examples
is because we haven’t had more force.
But we had a force this once, and one part of it had as difficult
a task as ever fell to the lot of soldiers. Nineteen thousand of
them were scattered in one hundred thirty-four places in the South
to enforce stringent, cruel laws for a conquered people. The ire
of the North had vented itself in insulting control. No one who had
given aid to the Confederacy was allowed to hold office. The northern
carpetbagger swaggered in to lord over poverty-stricken communities.
This exhibition of revenge leads one to believe the statement of the
clergymen that peace treaties, peace reactions and peace societies are
our most fruitful causes of war.
But there was one saving grace--and that lay in the treatment of the
southern people by the soldier. You know it’s a funny thing about
fighters. After the fight is over, they seldom hold grudges. We can
all call up many instances where they were outstandingly friendly
with the former opponents. The Union soldier in the South was no
exception. He saw too clearly the injustice to these stricken people
and sympathized with them. He leagued up with the former Confederate
soldiers in efforts to help. He often got around the laws and sometimes
overrode them. His reports to Washington had much to do with rescinding
cruel legislation. So helpful was his attitude that a southern city
afterwards erected a monument to a Union general. The soldier’s
understanding sympathy was the big factor in overcoming riots,
disorders and slaughter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account