Soliloquies in England, and Later SoliloquiesSantayana, George
Philosophy
Soliloquies in England, and Later Soliloquies
Santayana, George
American essays -- 20th century
not consent to be absurd, though absurd we are. We have no fundamental
humility. We do not wish the moments of our lives to be caught by a
quick eye in their grotesque initiative, and to be pilloried in this
way before our own eyes. For that reason we don't like Dickens, and
don't like comedy, and don't like the truth. Dickens could don the
comic mask with innocent courage; he could wear it with a grace, ease,
and irresistible vivacity seldom given to men. We must go back for
anything like it to the very greatest comic poets, to Shakespeare or to
Aristophanes. Who else, for instance, could have penned this:
"It was all Mrs. Bumble. She _would_ do it," urged Mr.
Bumble; first looking found to ascertain that his partner
had left the room.
"That is no excuse," replied Air. Brownlow. "You were
present on the occasion of the destruction of these
trinkets, and indeed are the more guilty of the two, in
the eye of the law; for the law supposes that your wife
acts under your direction."
"If the law supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, squeezing
his hat emphatically in both hands, "the law is a ass,
a idiot. If that's the eye of the law, the law is a
bachelor; and the worst I wish the law is, that his eye
may be opened by experience--by experience."
Laying great stress on the repetition of these two words,
Mr. Bumble fixed his hat on very tight, and putting his
hands in his pockets, followed his helpmate downstairs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account