“The latter came upon me as a further shock. Though very lovely both
in their excessive length and hue, they did not match that style of
face; to have done so they should have been black or brown--and their
expression was repellent.
“I say repellent; I might with great accuracy say ‘hellish,’ for I saw
in them the mirror of a sinful soul--of a VERY sinful soul.
“I could form no idea as to her dress, the blaze effectually hid
everything save her face; but from the partial glimpse I caught of
a pair of satin shoes, I surmised she was in some sort of ball-room
costume. The duration of her transit, though to me an eternity, could
not, I fancy, have occupied more than a very few seconds.
“Still gazing at me and beating the air with its hands, the phantom
rushed shrieking onwards, disappearing with the impetus of a tornado in
the inhabited portion of the house.
“I had no further ‘use’ for ‘Eugene Aram.’ I returned to my mother.
“The same phenomena was witnessed by Marie and Eugenie respectively
within the next three days--on the fourth we left. Had we remained,
there might have been a fatality; we were all genuinely frightened--and
mother is an invalid--a very nervous invalid.
“Perhaps you feel inclined to say it was all a matter of nerves. What
more likely! We were an isolated quartet of over-imaginative women! Or
you might say that some story we had heard in connection with the house
suggested these occult demonstrations.
“Do not be premature! We only heard a few weeks ago that ‘The Hall’
had a reputation for being haunted, and it is now several months since
we left Thurlow. Our informant, a former tenant, was, we have every
reason to believe, a person of indisputable veracity and common sense,
in short, a person quite incapable of inventing any such story as the
following which he kindly narrated for our satisfaction.
“It appears from what he told us (his MS. is still in my bureau) that
Thurlow Hall once belonged to Mrs. Purvis, an old lady with one child,
Charles.
“Charles was, of course, the apple of her eye; Charles ruled the house;
every one must obey Mr. Charles; Mr. Charles could do nothing wrong.
Nothing wrong until, in the heyday of his youth, in the season of wild
oats, he unexpectedly fell in love with a Gaiety girl--Phyllis (no one
remembered her other name)--and married her--and THAT was very wrong.
“His mother was indignant--FURIOUS--not with Charles, of course--but
with that creature--Phyllis.
“Phyllis had inveigled him into marrying her; Phyllis would bring
eternal disgrace on the family; Phyllis would run away with another man
and ruin him.
“Ruin HIM--ruin Charles--and the fond mother grew despondent, very
despondent, so despondent indeed that unkind neighbours said she was
mad. They were wrong; the despondency was only a reaction, she suddenly
cheered up, all was apparently forgiven and forgotten. Charles and
Phyllis were invited to spend Christmas at Thurlow.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account