I dived into the history of Guilsborough, and discovered that
quantities of fossils (trilobites, &c.), together with implements of
flint--_i.e._, arrow-heads, javelins, celts (the latter popularly known
as “thunderbolts”) have been and are still found in various parts of
the village and in the gravel-pits of the adjoining hamlets of Nortorft
and Hollowell; that tumuli yet remain in Guilsborough Park and in
several of the neighbouring fields, and that numbers of very ancient
bones have been from time to time dug out of the soil in all parts of
the village.
All this is conclusive evidence that Guilsborough is far older than its
average inhabitant of to-day imagines, that it has been alternately the
site of Palaeolithic and Neolithic settlements, and that all sorts of
barbaric rites and ceremonies have been conducted on the very ground
where houses and cottages now stand.
Hence it is not very surprising to any one at all versed in the _modus
operandi_ of Phantasms and Psychic Phenomena to hear that one of the
apparitions (at least) haunting Guilsborough appears in the form of a
sub-human or sub-animal elemental.
Superphysical manifestations of this kind--let me explain for the
benefit of the inexperienced--usually occur on the sites of or near
ancient and unconsecrated or long-disused burial-places--the whys and
the wherefores of which I hope to dwell upon in detail in a subsequent
volume.
PART II
I now append the account of the Croxford Trial copied (with as
few alterations as possible) from the pamphlet reprinted by
Mr. Henson of Northampton in 1848
At the Assizes held at Northampton on Thursday, August 2, 1764, came on
before the Right Honourable the Lord Chief Baron Varker the trials of
Benjamin Deacon, John Croxford, and Richard Butlin for the murder of a
travelling pedlar--known only as Scottie--at a house of ill-fame called
“Catslo”--in the Parish of Guilsborough, kept by one Thomas Seamark
(who was executed at Northampton on April 23 last for a robbery on the
highway) and had been a receptacle of thieves and highwaymen for some
time.
The chief evidence against them was that of Anne Seamark, widow of the
above Thomas Seamark. She deposed that sometime between Michaelmas and
Christmas last the said pedlar (supposed to be one Thomas Corey) came
to the said house where were at that time the said Seamark, Deacon,
Croxford, and Butlin to whom he offered stockings, &c., for sale, but
not agreeing as to the price, they proposed to murder him and directly
Seamark knocked him down, Butlin fell upon his legs, Deacon upon his
face to prevent him crying out and Croxford, pulling out a knife, cut
his throat in such a manner that the head was almost off, but the body
stirring a little, Croxford stabbed him in the head which put an end to
his life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account