Some old masters of Greek architectureDouglas, Harry
History
Some old masters of Greek architecture
Douglas, Harry
Architecture -- Greece; Architecture, Greek
As already stated, in no branch of the arts did the age of Pericles
make a deeper and more lasting impression than in that of architecture.
Although the Doric order was employed many hundred years before his
time, and the Ionic scarcely less many, yet the finest types of each
and the examples of these orders which stand for their most perfect and
artistic development are to be found in the Acropolis at Athens in the
time of Pericles, the Parthenon serving as the criterion of one and the
Erechtheum as the model of the other. That these orders should have
been brought to such perfection and endowed with their crowning dignity
and grace, must alone prove without further argument, if need be, that
the architectural talent and artistic sense of the age was incomparable.
The part which the great sculptor Phidias played in the art drama of
his time has been already alluded to, but not sufficiently, perhaps, to
exclude a further reference to him.
The comparison has often been made between Phidias and the talented
revivalist of the fifteenth century, Michael Angelo, and a casual
consideration of the two eminent artists would indicate that it was a
proper one. They were both sculptors, both painters, both engravers
(Phidias of gems), but they were not both architects, as is erroneously
assumed. As to the respective degrees of talent which each manifested
toward the branches of art which he professed, they also differed
widely. In sculpture the school of Michael Angelo will not outlive that
of Phidias, but in painting, especially in its application to mural
decoration, the Greek must bow to the Italian. In architecture also
Phidias possessed none of the technical knowledge and skill which in
Michael Angelo enabled him to suspend the great dome of St. Peter’s
“as if in the air,” and which was so important a factor in his long
artistic career, manifested in other ways as well, and gaining for him
perpetual applause. However, the two artists may be well compared,
inasmuch that they both created epochs of their own; and both excelled
in exhibiting a noble understanding as to the high and exalted
possibilities of art that has never been equalled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account