Some possible bearings of genetics on pathology — John Shaqi
Some possible bearings of genetics on pathologyMorgan, Thomas Hunt
Science
Some possible bearings of genetics on pathology
Morgan, Thomas Hunt
Diseases -- Causes and theories of causation; Genetics; Heredity; Pathology
[Illustration: FIG. 2. Cross between long and vestigial wings, giving
long in F₁. The long-winged hybrid F₁ female is then represented as
out-bred to a wild-type male, giving long-winged offspring again—half
pure-long and half hybrid-long. The last are represented as again
out-bred to wild type, giving long-winged offspring again and of the same
two genetic kinds as above.]
When the vestigial fly was crossed to normal the mutant character
disappeared in the hybrid. If such a hybrid is out-bred to normal all
the offspring are again normal, but half of them carry the vestigial
gene. If these are out-crossed again still only normal flies appear,
Fig. 2. If such out-breeding is continued the vestigial gene will become
widely distributed without ever showing itself at the surface, so to
speak. If, however, at any time two hybrid flies mate, then a quarter
of the offspring will have vestigial wings. It might seem then that the
character had appeared for the first time in the race, if one did not
know its past. In reality its gene may have been there for some time.
Probably many of the recessive defects and malformations that appear
in the human race—at least those due to hereditary factors—have had
representative genes in the germ-plasm for several generations before
they have appeared on the surface.
We do not know how widespread recessive genes are in the human
germ-plasm. The fact that defective individuals appear in certain
communities may be safely interpreted to mean that individuals bearing
the same gene have at last come together. On the other hand, the absence
of such individuals from the community, at large, may only mean that the
chance of suitable combinations is small, and does not mean necessarily
that the gene in question is confined to the community within which the
defects have been recorded.
My illustration may give, however, an entirely erroneous idea as to
the chance of a recessive character contaminating the race. If one can
control the matings, so that out-breeding takes place each time, the
result would undoubtedly be like that in our diagram; but what chance
is there for a recessive character, that is neither beneficial nor
injurious, if left to itself, to contaminate widely the race with its
gene? The answer is that for any one defect there is hardly any chance
at all. On the other hand, there is always a possibility that a defect
_may_ become widespread despite the chances against each in turn. If a
recessive _character_ is selected against each time it appears on the
surface, the chance is extraordinarily small that the gene for such
a character could ever become widespread in a race. If the recessive
character is advantageous, its chance is somewhat better, but still the
chance that it may be lost is very great.
Let us turn for a moment to the inheritance of a Mendelian dominant
character, and to simplify the situation let us first assume that the
character itself is neither advantageous nor disadvantageous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account