Some Recollections of Our Antislavery ConflictMay, Samuel J. (Samuel Joseph)
History
Some Recollections of Our Antislavery Conflict
May, Samuel J. (Samuel Joseph)
Antislavery movements -- United States
“This horrible law, which in the middle of the nineteenth century
of the Christian era the legislators of the most highly favored
nation on earth have had the effrontery to enact,--this law
peremptorily, under heavy fines and penalties, forbids us to give
assistance and comfort to a certain class of our fellow-men in
the utmost need of help,--those who have fled and are longing
to be saved from the greatest wrongs that can be inflicted upon
human beings,--_the wrongs of slavery_. And yet we are told
by many--many who profess to be Christians, even teachers of
Christianity, ah! Doctors of Divinity--that the pulpit may not
remonstrate against this tremendous iniquity, because, forsooth,
it has passed into a law. What, are we, then, to allow that there
is no authority higher than that of the earthly government under
which we live,--a government framed by our revered but fallible
fathers, and which we administer by agents of our own election,
who are by no means incorruptible? Has it come to this? Is this
the best lesson our Republican and Christian wisdom can teach the
suffering nations of earth? Nay, are we to submit to this human
authority without question? May we not so much as discuss the
justice of its demands upon us? Must even those men be silent who
were set in our midst for the defence of the Gospel,--the Gospel
of Him who was ‘anointed to preach to the poor, who was sent to
heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, to
set at liberty them that are bruised?’ Such is the doctrine of our
politicians and of our politico-religious ministers. But a more
heartless, demoralizing, base, antidemocrat, and antichristian
doctrine could not be preached. I repudiate it utterly.... _The
pulpit has no higher function than to expound, assert, and
maintain the rights of man._ The assumption of Mr. Webster and his
abettors--that there is no higher law than an enactment of our
Congress or the Constitution of the United States--is glaringly
_atheistical_, inasmuch as it denies the supremacy of the Divine
Author of the _moral constitution_ of man....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account