Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.Astell, Mary
Philosophy
Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.
Astell, Mary
Marriage; Women -- Social conditions
And if this be the true Meaning of honourable Courtship, what is meant
by that Jargon, that Profusion of Love and Admiration which passes for
Gallantry, when either of the Parties are married? Is it not the utmost
Scurrility, in that it supposes she is, or that he hopes to make her,
what good Manners forbids to name? And since he makes so free with the
Lady’s Honour, can she afford him a civiller Answer, than what her
Footman may deliver with a Crab-tree? But I correct my self,——this might
be the Air of a haughty _Roman_ Prude; our _British_ Beauties are far
more Gentle and Well-bred. And he who has the same Designs upon other
Mens Relations, is sometimes so civil as to bear with the Outrages
offer’d to his own.
Not but that ’tis possible, and sometimes Matter of Fact, to express our
selves beyond the Truth in Praise of a Person, and yet not be guilty of
Flattery; but then we must Think what we Say, and Mean what we Profess.
We may be so blinded by some Passion or other, especially Love, which in
Civil and Good-natur’d Persons is apt to exceed, as to believe some
Persons more deserving than really they are, and to pay them greater
Respect and Kindness than is in Strictness due to them. But this is not
the present Case; for our fine Speech-makers doat too much on themselves
to have any great Passion for another. Their Eyes are commonly too much
fix’d on their own Excellencies, to view another’s good Qualities
through a Magnifying-Glass; at least if ever they turn that End of the
Perspective towards their Neighbours, ’tis only in Respect and Reference
to themselves. They are their own Centres, they find a Disproportion in
every Line that does not tend thither, and in the next Visit they make,
you shall hear all the fine Things they had said, repeated to the new
Object, and nothing remembred of the former but her Vanity, or something
else as ridiculous, which serves for a Foil, or a Whet to Discourse. For
let there be ever so many Wits in the Company, Conversation would
languish, and they would be at a Loss, did not a little Censoriousness
come in at a Need to help them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account