And here a word may be said about the arrangement of the contents,
which is not chronological, yet anything but haphazard. The intention
has rather been to make it lyrical and vital. I conceive that a
collection like this, which is virtually an anthology gathered from
the domain of a single poet, should as nearly as possible be itself
a poem. That is, it should be so composed, so put together, that the
reader may pass from number to number in the sequence as easily and
naturally as he would pass from verse to verse of a single poem:
even more easily and naturally, perhaps, from a continually renewed
sense of refreshment, of slightly changed animation. But this effect
is not to be achieved without taking pains. An editor who aims at
it must be keenly and even anxiously observant of many values—of
values constituted by metrical quality, subject matter, moral mood
and so forth—in all the varieties of each and in their interactions.
He must try to maintain continuity (the continuity of unflagging
animation, interest and enjoyment in the act of reading) through
variety and relief, and even through the occasional sudden contrast
which may express either a natural reaction and subsidence of mood,
or an impetus of the poetic soul in fresh directions. Finally, while
disregarding the mere time-order of composition (since the poem which
best speaks the truth for a man’s forty-sixth year may well have
been written at twenty-one) he must yet try to suggest something of
the tone of the poet’s different life-periods, and these in their
right order. If the attempt is at all successful, the resulting
arrangement should not only do justice to each individual poem by a
sympathetic setting, but should compass a general effect of unity
and of personality. How far the series from _There was a Lad to Auld
Lang Syne_ realises this ideal it is not for me to say. Other things
besides the ideal had claims to be considered, such as the proposed
scope of the book and the need to distribute the illustrations
reasonably through the volume. But I may say that from point to point
it has only been after many re-readings and searching comparisons
that I have finally decided whether _this_ or _this_ or _this_ poem
would most happily and economically follow _that_ one; regard being
also had to others that were yet to come. Felicity in the metrical
transition was, it will be seen, the value predominantly considered
in the earlier pages, while towards the close (I speak of the _Songs
and Lyrics_ section) there has been more conscious grouping of poems
reinforcing one another in the expression or suggestion of a mood or
colour-tone of the mind. I say predominantly; for both principles of
arrangement, as well as those of relief and contrast, have been used
throughout. Thus _Lassie wi’ the Lint-White Locks_, _The Posie_, _My
Lady’s Gown_, and _The Daisy_ (pp. 41-4) have an element in common—a
certain refinement and gentleness of feeling—which brings them within
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account