Sources of the Synoptic GospelsPatton, Carl S. (Carl Safford)
Religion
Sources of the Synoptic Gospels
Patton, Carl S. (Carl Safford)
Bible. Gospels -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
In the saying about the distress in Judaea (Mk xiii, 14-20; Mt xxiv,
15-22; Lk xxi, 20-24), Mark's construction of a neuter noun with a
masculine participle, a construction according to the sense (βδέλυγμα ...
ἑστηκότα), his unusual construction of εἰς τὸν ἀγρὸν meaning "in the
field," and his equally strange combination of words ἔσονται γὰρ αἱ ἡμέραι
εκεῖναι θλίψις, οἵα οὐ γέγονεν τοιαύτη, are all replaced by Matthew and
Luke. Luke omits ὁ ἀναγινώσκων νοείτω, because it is not applicable to his
readers. He adds "until the times of the nations are fulfilled,"
apparently upon Paul's hypothesis that the end could not come till the
gospel had first been preached to all the nations (Rom xi, 11, 15, 31).
This is Luke's substitute for the explanation which Matthew has copied
from Mark, that the Lord has shortened the days for the sake of the
Christians. In the speech about the parousia (Mk xiii, 24-27; Mt xxiv,
29-31; Lk xxi, 25-28), Matthew has added εὐθέως. This is Mark's favorite
adverb, and its addition by Matthew where it is lacking in Mark is hard to
understand. Perhaps, as Bacon says, Matthew the Palestinian wishes to
encourage the hope of the speedy coming of Jesus, while Mark the Roman
wishes to discourage it; but the reasons for this are not perfectly clear.
Schmiedel considers the omission of the εὐθέως in Mark as a sign of his
secondary character at this point.
In the passage about the time of the parousia (Mk xiii, 30-32; Mt xxiv,
34-36; Lk xxi, 32-33), Luke omits Mark's statement that "the son" does not
know the time; because he always avoids any implication of a limitation in
the knowledge of Jesus.[46] In the preparation for the Passover (Mk xiv,
12-17; Mt xxvi, 17-20; Lk xxii, 7-14), Luke omits the "my" in the question
which Jesus tells the disciples to ask, "Where is my chamber where I
shall," etc.; perhaps, as Hawkins[47] suggests, because it may have seemed
to him a somewhat harshly expressed claim.
In the institution of the Last Supper (Mk xiv, 22-25; Mt xxvi, 26-29; Lk
xxii, 15-20), Luke adds (xxii, 19-20) words which seem to be taken from
Paul's account in I Cor xi, 25. Westcott and Hort regard them as
interpolated from that epistle. Matthew adds, in his vs. 28, as he has
added in his account of the purpose of John's baptism, "for the remission
of sins."
In the account of Jesus in Gethsemane (Mk xiv, 32-42; Mt xxvi, 36-46; Lk
xxii, 39-46), Luke's vss. 43-44 are lacking in many manuscripts, and are
probably a later addition. Luke and Matthew, probably from the growth of
the tradition, and from the wish not to omit anything from this solemn
scene, represent Jesus as addressing Judas, but do not agree in the words
ascribed to him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account