South Africa -- Description and travel; South Africa -- History -- 1836-1909; South Africa -- History -- To 1836
I profess the greatest possible respect for the Cape Colony Blue Book
and for its compilers. I feel when trusting to it that I am standing
upon a rock against which waves of statistical criticism may dash
themselves in vain. Such at least is my faith as to 968 out of the 969
folio pages which the last published volume contains. But I would put it
to the compilers of that valuable volume, I would put it to my
particular friend Captain Mills himself, whether they, whether he, can
get a European man-servant for £30 a year, or a European damsel for £16
4s.! Double the money would not do it. Let them, let him, look at the
book;--Section v. page 3;--and have the little error corrected, lest
English families should rush out to the Cape Colony thinking that they
would be nicely waited upon by white fingers at these easy but fabulous
rates. The truth is that European domestic servants can hardly be had
for any money.
NATAL.
CHAPTER XIV.
NATAL.--HISTORY OF THE COLONY.
The little Colony of Natal has a special history of its own quite
distinct from that of the Cape Colony which cannot be said to be its
parent. In Australia, Queensland and Victoria were, in compliance with
their own demands, separated from New South Wales. In South Africa the
Transvaal Republic,--now again under British rule,--and the Orange Free
State were sent into the world to shift for themselves by the Mother
Country. In these cases there is something akin to the not unnatural
severance of the adult son from the home and the hands of his father.
But Natal did not spring into existence after this fashion and has owed
nothing to the fostering care of the Cape Colony. I will quote here the
commencing words of a pamphlet on the political condition of Natal
published in 1869, because they convey incidentally a true statement of
the causes which led to its colonization. “The motives which induced the
Imperial Government to claim Natal from the Dutch African emigrants were
not merely philanthropic. The Dutch in their occupation of the country
had been involved in serious struggles with the Zulus. The apprehension
that these struggles might be renewed and that the wave of disturbance
might be carried towards the Eastern frontier of the Cape influenced to
some extent the resolution to colonize Natal. But whatever may have been
the prudential considerations that entered into their counsels, the
Government were deeply impressed with the wish to protect the Natives
and to raise them in the scale of humanity.”[14] From this the reader
will learn that the British took up the country from the Dutch who had
on occupying it been involved in difficulties with the Natives, and that
the English had stepped in to give a government to the country, partly
in defence of the Dutch against the Natives,--but partly also, and
chiefly in defence of the Natives against the Dutch. This was, in truth,
the case. The difficulties which the Dutch wanderers had encountered
were awful, tragic, heartrending.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account