Spanish and Portuguese South America during the Colonial Period; Vol. 1 of 2Watson, Robert Grant
History
Spanish and Portuguese South America during the Colonial Period; Vol. 1 of 2
Watson, Robert Grant
America -- Discovery and exploration; South America -- History -- To 1806
NOTE.--The problem of rendering in English the names of places in
foreign countries is one of some difficulty, and rests rather on
conventionality than on principle. It is solved by different
writers in different fashions. Greek purists have for some time
past lost no opportunity, in writing Greek words, of substituting
the original Greek K for the Roman C; but they still respect the
latter in names of such places, familiarized to our ears by
Scripture, as Corinth and Crete. In like manner Oriental purists,
such as Sir Frederic Goldsmid and Colonel Malleson, have done their
best to introduce into English literature a system of orthography
as to Oriental names which is, of course, in place in the
schoolroom of a professor of Oriental languages, but which has not
yet made itself fully accepted by the general English reader. Those
of us whose acquaintance with Indian history began with the reading
of Macaulay’s Essays on Clive and Hastings, are loth to accept
_Pílasi_ for Plassey and _Lakhnao_ for the capital of the princely
House of Oude.
To look nearer home, it would be pedantic to use _El Kahira_ for
Cairo, or _Dimishk_ for Damascus. It would be little less so,
although strictly correct, to use _Venezia_ for Venice, _Roma_ for
Rome, or _Livorno_ for Leghorn. We have added an _s_--why, I know
not--to the French spelling of the word _Marseille_. That port is
as familiar in our mouths as Liverpool or Glasgow, but we
invariably write it and pronounce it Marseilles. In writing Spanish
or Portuguese words applied to names of places in South America, I
find a considerable divergence of custom amongst authors. To take
the one name of _Assumption_, for instance. The capital of
_Paraguay_ is so written by the Robertsons and other writers,
whilst in Southey’s History of Brazil it is throughout written
_Assumpcion_. In Washburn’s History of Paraguay it becomes
_Asuncion_, the original Spanish name, which I see no reason to
supersede. As a rule I have followed the native names of places in
Portuguese or Spanish America, they being for the most part those
by which they are known in England.
CHAPTER II.
_THE DISCOVERY OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN._
1508-1514.
[Sidenote: 1508.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account