Spanish colonial literature in South AmericaMoses, Bernard
History
Spanish colonial literature in South America
Moses, Bernard
Spanish American literature -- History and criticism
For six years in the first decade of the nineteenth century Pérez García
was engaged in writing his _Historia general, natural y militar, civil
y sagrada del reino de Chile_, completed, as he announced on the last
sheet of his manuscript, March 19, 1808. The first part of this book is
taken up with references to the Virgin as the “discoverer, conqueror,
and colonizer of the kingdom of Chile”; with a discussion of the origin
of the Americans, with an inquiry as to the probable population of this
continent before the Noachian flood, and with the question as to the
presence of the Apostle Thomas on this continent. This part has neither
interest nor historical value. And, considering the author’s lack of
literary training, one ought not to be disappointed in finding the
writing crude and the language in many instances incorrect. “But the
real merit of Pérez García’s manuscript,” according to Barros Arana’s
judgment, “resides in the historical narrative which constitutes about
three-quarters of the whole work. This writer has prepared himself with
a profound study of the chronicles, those in manuscript as well as those
in print, and of the documents that came to his hands, and although with
complete neglect of literary forms, he was able to make a book which
has a true value and which may be consulted with profit now, after many
documents have been discovered, and after the history of the conquest and
colonization have begun to be rewritten with the new light which they
furnish. The reason of the superiority of the history of Pérez García
over those that preceded it is found in the fact that the author has not
always accepted as unquestionable truth what he found written by other
authors; that he has attempted to verify the statements for himself and
by means of comparing those narratives with the documents; and that
finally he has corrected in many points numerous errors, and has set
down facts from his own investigations that are not found in the other
chronicles.”[205]
[Sidenote: Carvallo’s work]
[Sidenote: Carvallo and O’Higgins]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account