Spanish PaintingBeruete y Moret, A. de (Aureliano)
History
Spanish Painting
Beruete y Moret, A. de (Aureliano)
Painting -- Spain -- History; Painting, Spanish
The works of the primitive period placed on view, though all of peculiar
interest, and several of striking character, were still inadequate to
give a just idea of the development of early art in the Iberian
Peninsula. The first essays of Spanish art were indeed lacking in
national characteristics. At a time when Italy and Flanders produced
painters of distinctive note, Spain, and perhaps the whole
Peninsula--for in this connection we must not forget Portugal--filled
its churches, monasteries and convents with panels and altarpieces. With
the exception of the names of several artists now identified, all of its
productions are of doubtful paternity, its style is borrowed and in
general is distinguished only by the possession of regional
characteristics of a minor kind. Therefore the paintings on panel that
it produced are to-day referred to, in order to distinguish them one
from another, as belonging to the Castilian, Portuguese, Catalan,
Aragonese or Valencian Schools. For this there is an historical reason.
The Peninsula, at the time in which its early art was produced, was
divided into different kingdoms and states, each absolutely independent
and having its own history and traditions. Thus the kingdom of Aragon,
with Valencia, was intimately connected with the Mediterranean, and came
within the sphere of Italian influence. Castile was more closely related
to the states of Flanders and the Rhine, admitting and developing
Flemish and German tendencies. Catalonia possessed an art very similar
to that of Provence. But I believe that all this work, chaotic, lacking
in national expression, and in determinative characteristics, presents a
difficult problem for its investigators. Add to this that these panels
and altarpieces were often the joint work of several artists, one
painting costumes, others specialising in heads and hands, others in
drapery, still others in backgrounds, so that the whole resulted
frequently in a composition confused and equivocal. All that can be said
with any degree of certainty is that the production of this time was
large, rich and of great merit, so far as that can be attained by a race
of colourists who were lacking in discipline and insight.
This manifestation of pictorial art did not obtrude itself in any
decided manner until the fourteenth century. To discover its origin we
may have to compare it with the miniatures in the manuscripts of San
Isidor, or the archaic mural decorations traceable by Byzantine art, and
it would seem to possess a greater archæological than artistic interest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account