"Exception noted. Counsel, will you rephrase your question so that no
lack of foresight is implied?"
"Certainly," smiled Kingman. "How were you certain that you were within
your rights?"
"If this plan had been open to any question, my superiors would not
have permitted me--"
"That will not serve!" snapped Kingman. "You are making an
implication--your testimony is biased."
"Naturally," barked Farrell. "No one but an idiot would claim to have
no opinion."
"Does that include the court?" asked Kingman suavely.
"Naturally not," retorted Farrell. "I was speaking of interested
parties."
"Let it pass. In other words, Dr. Farrell, you were never sure that you
were within your rights?"
"I object!" exploded Tinkin. "Counsel is questioning a witness whose
business is not legal matters on a subject which is legal in every
phase."
"Objection sustained," said Hamilton wearily. The matter was dropped,
but Kingman had gained his point. The item may never appear in the
records, but it was present in the judge's mind.
"Dr. Farrell," said Kingman, "since you have no legal training,
precisely what has been your education and background?"
"I hold a few degrees in physics, one in mathematics, and also in
physical chemistry." Farrell turned to the judge. "Judge Hamilton, may
I explain my position here?"
"You may."
"I have spent thirteen years studying physics and allied sciences. I
believe that I stand fairly high among my fellows. Since no man may be
capable in many arts, I believe that I have not been lax in not seeking
degrees in law."
"No objection," said Kingman. "Dr. Farrell, in order that the process
be properly outlined in the record, I am going to ask you to explain it
in brief. How does your matter transmitter work?"
Farrell nodded, and took time to think. Tinkin whispered in Don's ear:
"The stinker! He knows Hamilton hates anything more complex than a can
opener!"
"What can we do?"
"Hope that our demonstration blasts them loose. That's our best bet,
plus fighting for every inch."
* * * * *
Farrell moistened his lips and said: "Utilizing certain effects noted
with earlier experimentation, we have achieved the following effects.
The matter to be transmitted is placed in situ, where it is scanned
by an atom-scanner. This tube removes the substance, atom by atom,
converting the atoms to energy. This energy is then reconverted into
atoms and stored in a matter bank as matter again. The energy of
disintegration is utilized in reintegration at the matter bank with
but small losses. Since some atoms have higher energy than others, the
matter bank's composition will depend upon the scanned substance."
"The matter bank is composed of the same elements as the matter for
transmission?" asked Kingman.
"No. Some elements release more energy than others. It is desirable
that the energy-transfer be slightly negative. That is to say that
additional energy must be used in order to make the thing work."
"Why?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account