Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for educationHollingworth, Leta Stetter
Science
Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for education
Hollingworth, Leta Stetter
Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements; Exceptional children
II. RESULTS OF QUANTITATIVE INVESTIGATION
Many of the cherished hopes and desires of mankind concerning itself are
in some part violated by the teachings of scientific psychology.
Experimental psychology is not yet half a century old, dating its
beginning as a technical science from the founding of Wundt’s laboratory
at Leipzig, in 1879. Therefore, it is clear that the study of these
problems by quantitative methods brings us very close to the present
day.
When the problem of measuring mental capacity was first taken into the
laboratory, the modern definition of _a mental function_ began to be
formulated. It became apparent that a mind must be judged by its
product. The measurement of _performance_ is the only approach there is,
or probably ever will be, to the measurement of mind. On this basis it
was found impossible to identify or measure any such function as “the
reason,” “the memory,” “the observation,” “the imagination,” “the will,”
and similar supposed entities. _A mental function_ came to be defined as
“_an actually or possibly observable event in behavior_.” Thus,
memorizing digits, detecting absurdities, and reading English print are
examples of mental functions, in the sense in which the term is used
throughout the chapters of this discussion.
Other terms which are used to refer to performances or “events in
behavior,” are _abilities_ and _capacities_. A prolonged discussion
might be conducted, in an attempt to assign different technical meanings
to these words, and to bring out fine shades of distinction among them.
For instance, it might be claimed that “ability” should be reserved to
signify capacity _plus_ the skill acquired by practice, if any; while
“capacity” should mean the innate aptitude, apart from all training.
However, since capacity in this sense can never be known, but can only
be inferred from the degree of actual performance, under controlled
conditions, it hardly seems necessary to maintain such distinctions for
our purpose. Refinements of nomenclature will, therefore, be avoided,
and the terms _mental function_, _capacity_, and _ability_ will be used
interchangeably, to denote performance which depends on the inborn
integrity and sensitivity of the individual.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account