Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for educationHollingworth, Leta Stetter
Science
Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for education
Hollingworth, Leta Stetter
Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements; Exceptional children
The puzzle is that a given individual should “hit,” as it were, at
approximately the same point in the distribution of nearly every
function.
VI. CAN AN INTELLECT BE TRAINED AS A UNIT?
Studies of the learning process also give light upon the organization of
capacities. The question here is as to whether training in one function
spreads equally to all other functions. Is it possible to “train the
mind” as a whole? Will it raise the proficiency of all performances
fifty per cent, if a fifty per cent gain is achieved in Latin
composition?
Numerous attempts have been made to determine the extent to which skill
acquired in one performance increases skill in other performances. The
conclusion which emerges from these studies is that _intellect cannot be
trained as a unit_. Transfer of training from one function to other
functions is far from complete. Apparently, there is spread of
improvement from practice in a function only to such other functions as
have elements in common with it. If two performances differ in any way,
there is something in the second that remains _untrained_ by the
practice given to the first. If two performances differ in all respects,
the second seems not to derive any benefit at all from training in the
first.
To a very highly intelligent individual, nearly all situations and
performances tend to have some identical elements, no doubt. To a very
dull person, relatively few situations or demands present identical
elements, for the dull perceive only gross similarities and differences.
Thus, spread of improvement is without doubt greatest for the innately
gifted, and least for the innately inferior minds. In connection with
the present discussion, however, the chief point of interest is that no
mind, of whatever degree of innate integrity and sensitivity, can be
trained as a unit. Each function has elements special to itself, and
some functions are very highly specialized, as regards the amount of
transfer of training from them to others, or from others to them.
The evidence from learning, therefore, substantiates the evidence from
heredity, indicating that intellect is not a unit, but a complex of many
capacities, coinciding mysteriously in amount to a very marked extent in
an individual.
VII. THE HIERARCHY OF ABILITIES
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account