Speciation and Evolution of the Pygmy Mice, Genus Baiomys — John Shaqi
Speciation and Evolution of the Pygmy Mice, Genus BaiomysPackard, Robert L. (Robert Lewis)
Science
Speciation and Evolution of the Pygmy Mice, Genus Baiomys
Packard, Robert L. (Robert Lewis)
Mice
_Diagnosis._--Ramus of medium size to large for the genus; lower incisor
short, narrow transversely, prooedont; anterior median fold of m1 reduced
or absent; cingular ridges of m1 and m2 moderately well-developed; m3
large relative to m1 and m2; average and extreme measurements of lower
molars of seven specimens are, 3.0 (3.0-3.1).
_Comparisons._--For comparisons with _B. sawrockensis_ and _B.
rexroadi_, see accounts of those species. From _B. brachygnathus_, _B.
kolbi_ differs in: molar row longer; m3 and jaw larger; diastema longer;
masseteric ridge not so far forward; molars more depressed.
From _B. minimus_, _B. kolbi_ differs in: molar row longer; m3 larger;
jaw larger; diastema not so acutely curved; incisor shorter, narrower
transversely, more prooedont.
From _B. musculus_, _B. kolbi_ differs in: anterior median fold of m1
slightly developed or absent, instead of well-developed; m3 larger (not
reduced), external reentrant valley broad and extending farther across
crown of tooth; incisor smaller, and more prooedont; cingular ridges of
m1 and m2 less well-developed.
From _B. taylori_, _B. kolbi_ differs in: molars larger, more depressed;
incisor shorter, more prooedont; m3 smaller relative to m1 and m2;
external reentrant valley of m3 broad, extending farther across crown of
tooth.
_Remarks._--The slight development or absence of the anterior median
fold in _kolbi_ suggests that it was specialized. The anterior median
fold is well-developed in all species of _Baiomys_ save _B.
brachygnathus_ and _B. taylori_, in which the fold is only slightly
developed or absent. _B. kolbi_ may have paralleled _B. taylori_ in
specialization for a diet of grasses and for a life in open country.
=Baiomys brachygnathus= (Gidley)
_Peromyscus brachygnathus_ Gidley, U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Papers,
131:124, March 15, 1922.
_Baiomys brachygnathus_, Hibbard, Amer. Midland Nat., 26:352,
September, 1941.
_P. [eromyscus] brachygnathus_, Wilson, Carnegie Inst. Washington
Publ., 473:33, May 21, 1936.
_Type._--No. 10501, U. S. Nat. Mus.; right mandibular ramus bearing
m1-m3, and incisor; 2 mi. NE Curtis Ranch house, near a line between
sec. 28 and 29, T. 18 S, R. 21 E, Mid-Pleistocene (Hibbard, 1958:25),
Cochise County, Arizona.
_Referred material._--None.
_Diagnosis._--Ramus small for the genus; m3 reduced; jaw reduced
anteroposteriorly; incisor short, slender, prooedont; cingular ridges
well-developed, posterior ectolophid continuous from protoconid to
hypoconid in m1 and m2; diastema short; length of molar row 2.8 mm.
_Comparisons._--For comparisons with _B. rexroadi_ and _B. kolbi_, see
accounts of those species. From _B. minimus_, _B. brachygnathus_ differs
in: jaw not so slender anteriorly; masseteric ridge not so far anterior;
cheek-teeth slightly broader, less depressed, therefore, more hypsodont;
incisor shorter, more prooedont.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account