Speciation in the Brazilian Spiny Rats — John Shaqi
Speciation in the Brazilian Spiny RatsMoojen, João
Science
Speciation in the Brazilian Spiny Rats
Moojen, João
Proechimys
Morphologically _P. dimidiatus_ and _P. iheringi_ are sometimes
difficult to distinguish, especially on the basis of cranial features.
Nevertheless close attention to the small, nearly round, incisive
foramen of _P. dimidiatus_ versus the larger, more elongate foramen in
_P. iheringi_ will permit separation of the two. However, the two
species live in the same place and one is led to infer that there may be
greater differences in their physiology than in their morphology. In
fact Dr. H. W. Laemmert, from the Serviço de Estudos e Pesquisas Sobre a
Febre Amarela in Brazil, informs me that while _P. dimidiatus_ was
highly susceptible to the virus of yellow fever (18 out of 24 with virus
in circulation), _P. iheringi_ showed a lower rate of susceptibility (3
out of 25 with virus in circulation). _P. longicaudatus roberti_,
belonging in the other subgenus, showed no susceptibility at all.
At Teresópolis, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, the two species were found in
two different forests, only a few kilometers apart, but _dimidiatus_
lived at a higher elevation, where the humidity was remarkably higher.
Naturally the plant associations were different in the two forests. This
seeming ecological adaptation of the two kinds of _Proechimys_ may
explain why _P. iheringi_ ranges farther north; the forests to the
northward are less humid.
One of the four species, _P. setosus_, subspecies _elegans_, was used by
Winge (1941:80, 82) as representative of the genus _Proechimys_ when he
was estimating the relationships of that genus. Because _Cercomys_, with
four crests in each of its cheekteeth, was, on other grounds, regarded
by him (_op. cit._: 80) as "... the most primitive genus within the
group.", and because he noted in _P. s. elegans_ 4 crests in P4 and in
some first molars, he concluded that _Proechimys_ was "very closely
related to _Cercomys_." His conclusion seems to be correct, but actually
other species of _Proechimys_ (subgenus _Trinomys_), for example, _P.
dimidiatus_, have four or more crests in each cheektooth, and,
therefore, may be considered as more closely related to _Cercomys_ than
is _P. setosus_. If a large number of crests indicates primitiveness,
_P. dimidiatus_, always with four, is more primitive than any other
species in the subgenus _Trinomys_. Also, the large skull, long hind
foot, short tail and thin aristiforms of _P. dimidiatus_, in my opinion,
are primitive characters.
SUBSPECIFIC VARIATION IN THE SUBGENUS TRINOMYS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account