To determine the radius or focus of a concave lens, apply to its
surface a convex lens of the same focus, and holding the two together
as one glass, between the thumb and finger, at some distance before
the eye, give the hand a gentle motion to and fro, and if the objects
looked at through the lenses now in contact appear fixed, equal, and of
their natural size, then is the focus of the one correspondent to that
of the other; but if the convex lens is not of the same focal length as
the concave to which it is thus applied, then all objects looked upon
will appear to shake and have a tremulous motion.
Another method of ascertaining whether one concave lens is of the
same number, and worked in tools of the same radius as another, is to
hold one in each hand, placing their edges against each other, with
their centres in a parallel line; now withdraw ten or twelve feet
from the window, and observe the top and bottom bars of a square of
glass: if they appear equal and uniform in all their parts, parallel
to each other, and agreeing with the other squares in the window, then
are they of the same radius; but if they do not match, the bars will
appear disjointed, and higher or lower in one square than in the other.
The trial box of sights will be found very useful in making these
experiments.
Brazil pebbles, or crystallized quartz, are imported to this country
in rough blocks; these are cut or slit, by the aid of pulverized
diamond, into slabs or pieces, of the diameter required. Those pieces
in which bubbles, waves, or blemishes appear, are thrown aside by the
optician who is tenacious of his fair fame, as their imperfections
become more apparent in every after-stage of their progress; and when
polished, centred, and shaped for the spectacle-frame, they are really
improper to be used at all; nevertheless, the needy, or dishonest,
rather than lose a fraction of their gains, often persist in working
up such imperfect material, and harping upon their being pebble—real
pebble—palm them off upon the uninitiated as genuine articles. Pebbles
have the following important advantages: they are of equal density,
and exceedingly hard, firm, and clear; their surfaces are not liable
to become misty or scratched (which circumstance alone often compels
a change of glasses): they are of a pure, cool nature, and shew this
contrast to glass (which is, on the contrary, produced by the action
of artificial heat) in the touch of the finger or tongue to their
surfaces.[3] They are, in consequence of these properties, calculated
to suit the sight for a longer period than glass; but they need not be
thrown aside, when, from the indications already referred to, we find
an increase of magnifying power is required, as they can be re-worked
readily enough to meet the requirement of the eyes, and at an expense
scarcely more than a new pair of glasses, or about one-third of their
original cost. The directions for ascertaining the focus of concave or
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account