“We beg to caution our readers against the arts of all those who
profess to supply the public with superior Spectacles; we have been
for many years connected with the business, and we can assure the
public that the Spectacle glasses sold by the advertising eye quacks
are precisely the same as those provided by any respectable optician,
the only difference being in the price. The charlatan varies his
charge according to the gullibility of his dupes; sometimes he puts
up with double the proper and regular price, but more frequently he
exacts three or four times more than a regular and honest optician
charges. We recollect a once famous optical quack, in London, who
made a large fortune by cheating the public. He advertised _his_
superior glasses, which he assured the public were all ground to the
true parabolic curve by his own hand, and for each of these glasses
he charged four shillings, whilst the working optician who lived a
few doors from him, and who furnished him with all his glasses, could
only get nine pence for the very article for which the puffing eye
doctor charged four shillings. As we knew both the parties we pledge
ourselves to the fact, and, in conclusion, we advise the public to
have nothing to do with quacks, whether they be scientific quacks, who
are plentiful enough, or other quacks, who swindle people out of their
health and cash at the same time.”
CHAPTER VIII.
“Who will, for him, may boast of sense,
His better guard is impudence.”
In the early part of the present year I addressed letters to several
gentlemen who figure in the list of patrons to the advertising
Spectacle quacks, and enclosed a copy of the advertisements in which
their names had appeared as giving unqualified approval to the
trickster’s _invention_.
From the specimens I have given of such advertisements it is
unnecessary to give a verbatim copy again here; and as the truths which
this correspondence elicits apply to one and all of the puffing tribe,
I have omitted the names of the individuals particularly alluded to,
my object being to expose a _system_ of villainy, and not to denounce
_one_ or _two_ rapacious creatures, while the rest of the clique escape
detection.
Therefore, although many of the remarks in these pages may seem to
have only a local or particular reference, they are applicable to the
whole tribe of _locusts_, and describe the species too definitely to
admit of mistake. The characters sketched are not caricatures, but,
unfortunately for the eyes of her majesty’s lieges, really exist _in
propriâ personâ_.
Feeling assured that the Duke of Wellington would rejoice to see an
exposure of such tricksters, I forwarded to him a copy of Spectacle
Secrets, and the following acknowledgment was promptly returned:—
_Walmer Castle_, _Nov. 11, 1838_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account