Speeches at the Constitutional Convention: With the Right of Suffrage Passed by the Constitutional ConventionSmalls, Robert
History
Speeches at the Constitutional Convention: With the Right of Suffrage Passed by the Constitutional Convention
Smalls, Robert
African Americans -- Politics and government; African Americans -- Suffrage; South Carolina. Constitutional Convention (1895)
Claflin College was advocated for colored students, taught by Negroes;
the best, wherever they could be found, should be secured.
The committee on order, style and revision had the work ready, and
all that was needed was the signature of the members to make the
Constitution final. The members went up in county delegations and
signed the new organic law.
President Evans and Vice President Jones signed the new Constitution as
the officers present, and then came Abbeville and the other counties on
down. When Beaufort was reached, Delegate Smalls asked to be excused
from signing the Constitution, as he would not sign a Constitution with
such an article on suffrage. He was unanimously excused. He was the
only member of the Beaufort delegation present.
Some one during the progress of the signing sent up a resolution that
members not signing the Constitution should not be paid. Gen. Smalls
said he would walk home rather than sign the instrument. President
Evans did not press the resolution, and members generally thought
lightly of the matter, and it was not even put to the Convention.
* * * * *
EDITORIAL FROM THE (N. Y.) PRESS, OCT. 5, 1895.
We can recall no more brilliant moral victory of a parliamentary
minority than that gained on Thursday in the South Carolina
Constitutional Convention by the representatives of the race about to
be disfranchised for lack of intelligence wherewith to vote. In so
characterizing the attack of these black delegates we have in mind the
extraordinary ends accomplished with minorities by Mr. Randall, Mr.
Blaine and Mr. Reed, the chief parliamentarians of our generation.
In this case the white majority laid themselves open to the flank
movement, which Robert Smalls had evidently meditated throughout
the session, by introducing a quite supererogatory article for the
amendment of mixed marriages. The black leader instantly moved an
amendment providing that illicit as well as legal unions between the
races should be prohibited. He proposed to disqualify all men--and
this of course would mean only white men--who were parties to such
unions. He proposed that the offspring of such unions should take their
fathers’ names.
Senator Tillman, who seems, though the author of this new secession of
South Carolina, to be the only man in the Convention who appreciates
in the slightest degree the effect of its actions upon outside public
opinion, proceeded at once to save his record by espousing the Negro
cause. He cut himself loose promptly from the majority in the course
into which he knew its provincial ignorance would direct it. He went so
far as roundly to berate his own chairman for his attempt to choke off
the plea of the black men for the integrity of black women.
It was hardly a debate that followed. It was an arraignment which
culminated when Mr. Smalls, after approving the punishment which lynch
law has meted out to the worst offenders of his race, said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account