St. Nicholas v. 13 No. 9 July 1886: An Illustrated Magazine for Young Folks — John Shaqi
St. Nicholas v. 13 No. 9 July 1886: An Illustrated Magazine for Young FolksVarious
History
St. Nicholas v. 13 No. 9 July 1886: An Illustrated Magazine for Young Folks
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals; Children's periodicals, American
Gates may have winced under the rebuke, but he was then listening to
Conway's flattery, and that was more agreeable to him. Conway, on his part,
found Gates a convenient man to set up as a rival to Washington. He himself
did not aspire to be commander-in-chief, though he would have had no doubt
as to his capacity. Washington knew him well. "His merit as an officer,"
wrote the Commander-in-chief, "and his importance in this army exist more
in his own imagination than in reality. For it is a maxim with him to leave
no service of his own untold, nor to want anything which is to be obtained
by importunity." Conway thought Gates was the rising man, and he meant to
rise with him. He filled his ear with things which he thought would please
him, and among other letters wrote him one in which these words occurred:
"Heaven has determined to save your country, or a weak general and bad
counselors would have ruined it."
Now Gates was foolish enough to show this letter to Wilkinson, one of his
aids, and Wilkinson repeated it to an aid of Lord Stirling, one of
Washington's generals, and Lord Stirling at once sat down and wrote it off
to Washington. Thereupon Washington, who knew Conway too well to waste any
words upon him, sat down and wrote him this letter:
"SIR,--A letter which I received last night contained the following
paragraph:
"'In a letter from General Conway to General Gates he says: Heaven has
determined to save your country, or a weak general and bad counselors would
have ruined it.'
"I am, Sir, your humble servant,
"GEORGE WASHINGTON."
That was all, but it was quite enough to throw Conway and Gates and Mifflin
into a panic. How did Washington get hold of the sentence? Had he seen any
other letters? How much did he know? In point of fact, that was all that
Washington had seen. He had a contempt for Conway. He knew of Mifflin's
hostility and that Gates was now cool to him; but he did not suspect Gates
of any intrigue, and he supposed for a while that Wilkinson's message had
been intended only to warn him of Conway's evil mind.
Gates was greatly perplexed to know what to do, but he finally wrote to
Washington as if there were some wretch who had been stealing letters and
might be discovering the secrets of the American leaders. He begged
Washington to help him find the rascal. Washington replied, giving him the
exact manner in which the letter came into his hands, and then closed with
a few sentences that showed Gates clearly that he had lost the confidence
of his commander-in-chief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account