St. Nicholas, Vol. 13, No. 12, October 1886Various
General
St. Nicholas, Vol. 13, No. 12, October 1886
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals; Children's periodicals, American
I wish I had been at the county fair when Arthur Dart’s father
offered ten dollars to any one who would successfully perform
the “three stake proof,” as I am certain that I should have
made that amount by the operation, whether I had been asked to
pitch the “in” or “out” curve, both of which I find equally
easy to accomplish.
The question of why the ball curves after it has left the hand,
I account for as follows: If the “in” curve is to be pitched,
the ball touches the index finger the last thing before
leaving the hand, and, as it does so, the hand is quickly and
forcibly clenched, so that the ball is given a twirling motion.
Therefore it curves to the right (provided it is thrown with
the right hand). In the case of the “out” curve, the ball
touches the thumb the last thing before leaving the hand, and
consequently twists to the left, producing the “out” curve.
The “out” curve is so called because it is a ball thrown to a
right-handed batsman when in position, so that it curves _out_
toward the end of his bat, while the “in” curve is a ball
thrown to a batsman which curves _in_ toward his body.
The following may be safely taken as a rule as to
curve-pitching. If the ball be thrown so it twists the way
shown in Fig. 1, the ball will curve in; but, if it be thrown
so it will twist as indicated by Fig. 2, the ball will curve
out.
[Illustration: FIG. 1.]
[Illustration: FIG. 2.]
Trusting that this explanation is clear and satisfactory, and
hoping to see it in the “Letter-box,” I remain the stanch
friend and admirer of our National Game,
WILL P. SNIKPOH.
* * * * *
FISHKILL, N. Y.
DEAR ST. NICHOLAS: I have been reading with much interest the
letters concerning the curving of a base-ball, and would now
like to try my hand at offering an explanation. The theory that
I present is not original, being taken from “Wood’s Analytical
Mechanics,” p. 462, but it seems to be the one offering the
best explanation of the actual facts of the case. I will omit
what mathematics there is in it, in order to render it a little
more easily understood.
[Illustration]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account