St. Peter, His Name and His Office, as Set Forth in Holy ScriptureAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Religion
St. Peter, His Name and His Office, as Set Forth in Holy Scripture
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Peter, the Apostle, Saint
The _material_ part, amplitude and extension.--The _formal_
part, not only negative, but affirmative.--_Negative_, as
expelling from the one true Church all heretics and schismatics:
testimonies to it 237
_Affirmative_, at making a coherent body with members and
articulations 238
Testimonies to the _mode_ of this coherence, in Irenaeus,
Cyprian, and Tertullian, and the other Fathers, summed up
in S. Leo 239
Hence answers to the question whether the doctrine of
S. Peter's Primacy is contained in the creed.--It is involved
in one Catholic Church 243
CHAPTER IX.
THE NATURE, MULTIPLICITY, AND FORCE OF PROOF FOR S. PETER'S PRIMACY.
Different sorts of proof.--1. The principal here used, and the
subsidiary.--Their joint force 246
Hence, I. The nature of the answer required to it.--2. The
proof, if unanswered, demonstrates the Primacy to be revealed 247
3. Enquiry into the _certitude_ of the proof used 248
I. Force of the proof _in itself_ and _absolutely_.--Two
conditions requisite, and here found, authenticity of the
documents, and clearness of their evidence.--Number
and harmony of scriptural testimonies to the Primacy 249
The parallel of Julius Caesar 250
Collateral proof, supporting that of the holy Scriptures, so
that the whole consists in the harmony of these four:--1.
Scriptural documents.--2. Ancient witnesses.--3. Analogy.--4.
Facts of Christian history, in fourteen distinct classes 251
Prodigious force of this compound proof 256
No counter religious system producible by Greek, Anglican,
or pure Protestant, but mere negation and objection 257
II. Force of the proof _comparatively_ with other doctrines:
comparison with the texts on which Anglicans, Lutherans,
and Calvinists severally rely 259
Retort that all but Catholics are opposed to our interpretation;
answer, that from Catholics alone we are to gather the truth 260
Yet all protestants not agreed in opposing our interpretation
and reasons why their opposition is of little moment 261
Compare, likewise, opposition to the Church in the fourth,
fifth, and sixth centuries 264
And again the conduct of Lutherans and Anglicans in maintaining
their own distinctive texts.--But what, then, are the true
criteria of documentary evidence? They are four:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account