Staffordshire pottery and its historyWedgwood, Josiah C. (Josiah Clement)
History
Staffordshire pottery and its history
Wedgwood, Josiah C. (Josiah Clement)
Potters -- England; Staffordshire pottery; Wedgwood ware
The first pottery ware made at Bradwell was the same as Dwight’s “red
porcelaine.” On the land at Bradwell Farm was the seam of red clay
which formed the foundation of the ware, giving when fired a dense hard
red stoneware of fine texture.[21] There are in the South Kensington
Museum two pieces of “red porcelain” credited by Burton to Elers
and illustrated in his book. They are in marked contrast to the slip
decorated and marbled Staffordshire ware of the same time. They have
been turned in the lathe after throwing, and thus made thin and light.
The clay body is homogeneous and smooth, showing greater care in the
preparation of the body. The ornamentation is delicate and artistic, and
has been made by sealing a soft piece of the clay on to the ware with a
metal seal pressed over the soft clay. There is no glaze, but a high fire
has produced a ware so hard as to be almost forged solid. These things
show the hand of the ex-silversmith in size and shape and finish. The
Burslem imitators—Garner and the Wedgwoods—never made things like these.
Elers, though he may have stolen Dwight’s secrets, went ahead and showed
the possibilities of potting. He is said also to have produced black ware
of a similar character by mixing oxide of manganese—the “magnus” of Dr
Plot—with the clay body, and, though no known pieces of black Elers ware
can now be certainly identified, it is this black ware that his copyists
chiefly developed.[22]
[Illustration: 1. Red china teapot, probably by Elers. _c._ 1700.
2. Sample of later date, with moulded spout. Stoke-on-Trent Museums.]
[Illustration: Samples of solid agate ware made by Wedgwood or Whieldon.
_c._ 1760.
From the Stoke-on-Trent Museums (see p. 74).]
For Nemesis overtook John Philip Elers, and in spite of all his
secrecy, perhaps because of it, he was copied. Two potters, Twyford and
Astbury,[23] one of whom at least had already made pots after local
methods in Shelton, set themselves independently to acquire the arts of
the Dutchman. To lull the suspicions of Elers, Twyford shammed stupidity,
and Astbury, who was younger, passed himself off as an idiot. Recommended
by these strange qualifications, they asked and obtained employment and,
in time, the knowledge they desired. They went back to Shelton with their
acquired arts, and, in a few years, the most intelligent potters of North
Staffordshire knew how to make civilized pottery. But by 1710 John Philip
Elers was tired of his exile and of the treatment he had received. The
true porcelain which should detect poison was still unattained, and
his “red porcelain” and his black ware were become by somewhat sharp
practice a staple product of the district. So he shook off the clay of
Staffordshire from his feet and rejoined his brother in London.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account